2020
DOI: 10.1080/19386362.2020.1711553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of vertical seismic coefficient on cohesive-frictional soil slope under generalised seismic conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While determining CFS and the associated minimum FS of any slope, the effects of surcharge load (q, kN/m 2 ) and pore-water pressure (μ) over the sliding mass have been considered in this work. The impact of earthquake loading is simulated through equivalent static loading of the amount k h W in the horizontal direction and k v W in the vertical direction [41]. The coefficients k h and k v are called seismic coefficients acting toward horizontal and vertical directions, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While determining CFS and the associated minimum FS of any slope, the effects of surcharge load (q, kN/m 2 ) and pore-water pressure (μ) over the sliding mass have been considered in this work. The impact of earthquake loading is simulated through equivalent static loading of the amount k h W in the horizontal direction and k v W in the vertical direction [41]. The coefficients k h and k v are called seismic coefficients acting toward horizontal and vertical directions, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding materials with both cohesive and frictional components (c-ϕ' slope), Sahoo and Shukla (2021) found that the application of k v in the upward direction results in a lower FoS. However, Shukha and Baker (2008) found that for very steep c-ϕ' slopes, the critical condition is when k v is applied in the upward direction and for a gentle slope, this occurs when k v is applied in the downward direction.…”
Section: 25-33mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the traditional Newmark displacement approach assumes that the direction of seismic movement is downward along the sliding surface, ignoring the fact that both vertical and horizontal seismic forces alternate in direction, and their magnitude also change with the excitation. Some previous studies show that the vertical ground motion can have an important influence on the seismic stability of soil slopes 16–20 . Zhang et al 21 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some previous studies show that the vertical ground motion can have an important influence on the seismic stability of soil slopes. [16][17][18][19][20] Zhang et al 21 analyzed the effect of vertical ground motion on the Wenchuan earthquake landslides by FLAC modeling and concluded that calculated slope displacements are greater when both vertical and horizontal ground motions acted simultaneously than when only horizontal ground motion is considered. Korzec and Jankowski 22 conducted shaking table tests under bidirectional cyclic loads for thirty-five European seismic records, showing that the underestimation of permanent displacement can reach up to 19% if the vertical excitation is neglected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%