1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf00381572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of vibration frequency on finger blood flow

Abstract: A total of 18 healthy subjects (9 men and 9 women) 20-35 years of age were used to study the effect of vibration frequency on finger blood flow. Seven vibration frequencies of 16, 31.5, 63, 125, 250, 500 and 1,000 Hz, at vibrational accelerations of 10 m/s2 (rms: root mean square) or 50 m/s2 (rms), with the exception of 16 Hz, which was measured at only 10 m/s2 (rms), were randomly applied to the palm of the right hand for 1 min at intervals of about 3 min. Finger blood flow was measured simultaneously in both… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, although participants' foot placement was controlled and all were given the same instruction with regard to how to stand, it could not be confirmed that all participants' maintained the same posture throughout the 45-second FTV exposure period. Deviations in posture can influence vibration transmissibility due to changes in the surface contact area with the vibrating surface, which can influence the position of the bony structures and the degree of tension in different muscle groups of the trunk and the extremities, in turn changing the resonant frequency of the body structure [1,19,21,25,36,[38][39][40][41]. Thus, variations in the ankle and knee angles could have influenced the transmission of vibration from the platform through the feet and into the lower limbs.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, although participants' foot placement was controlled and all were given the same instruction with regard to how to stand, it could not be confirmed that all participants' maintained the same posture throughout the 45-second FTV exposure period. Deviations in posture can influence vibration transmissibility due to changes in the surface contact area with the vibrating surface, which can influence the position of the bony structures and the degree of tension in different muscle groups of the trunk and the extremities, in turn changing the resonant frequency of the body structure [1,19,21,25,36,[38][39][40][41]. Thus, variations in the ankle and knee angles could have influenced the transmission of vibration from the platform through the feet and into the lower limbs.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Confirming the resonant frequencies at different locations on the foot will help determine exposure frequencies that are most likely to lead to health risks [41] in workers exposed to FTV. A greater understanding of the transmissibility properties of the foot is also needed to design controls such as isolation platforms, anti-vibration drills, and personal protective equipment such as mats and insoles for workers exposed to FTV [42].…”
Section: Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumption underlies frequency weighting W h , used to predict the severity of hand-transmitted vibration (ISO 5349-1, 2001). Laboratory studies of acute responses to hand-transmitted vibration have found that with the same frequencyweighted acceleration at all frequencies there is more vasoconstriction in the fingers (on both the exposed hand and the unexposed hand) with frequencies greater than 30 Hz than with lower frequencies (Furuta et al, 1991;Bovenzi et al, 2000;Thompson and Griffin, 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disease is characterized by nervous, musculoskeletal, and vascular (white finger vasospasm) debilitating deficits in the upper extremities (Cherniack, 1990;Noel, 2000). Studies of HAVS and animal models of vibration exposure suggest that injury may be vibration frequency (Hz)-dependent, although the findings are contradictory (Hyvarinen et al, 1973;Okada, 1986;Furuta et al, 1991;Bovenzi et al, 2000). While vibrating tools emit complex waveforms of amplitude, direction, and fre-frequency (Radwin et al, 1990;Hutton et al, 1993).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%