1993
DOI: 10.1016/0920-4105(93)90039-h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of wall roughness in turbulent pipe flow of a pseudoplastic crude oil: An evaluation of pipeline field data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results quantified the delay in transition from laminar to turbulent flow caused by shear-thinning, the suppression of turbulent fluctuations, and the drag reduction at high Reynolds numbers. Hemeida (8) presented an equation for estimating the thickness of the laminar sublayer in turbulent pipe flow of pseudoplastic fluids and validated the friction factors against the reported correlations and field measurements. It was found that the hydraulically smooth pipes can be used to determine the pressure loss in the tested pipeline because the thickness of the laminar sublayer was greater than the average roughness height.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The results quantified the delay in transition from laminar to turbulent flow caused by shear-thinning, the suppression of turbulent fluctuations, and the drag reduction at high Reynolds numbers. Hemeida (8) presented an equation for estimating the thickness of the laminar sublayer in turbulent pipe flow of pseudoplastic fluids and validated the friction factors against the reported correlations and field measurements. It was found that the hydraulically smooth pipes can be used to determine the pressure loss in the tested pipeline because the thickness of the laminar sublayer was greater than the average roughness height.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Thus, Torrance (1963) and Szilas et al (1981) have incorporated a small correction to account for pipe roughness in their expressions for the turbulent fl ow of power-law and Bingham plastic fl uids; under fully turbulent conditions, it is assumed that the value of the friction factor is determined only by pipe roughness and rheological properties, and is independent of the Reynolds number. However, in view of the fact that laminar sub-layers tend to be somewhat thicker for non-Newtonian fl uids than that for Newtonian liquids, the effect of pipe roughness is likely to be small for time-independent fl uids ( Bowen, 1961 ;Hemeida, 1993 ;Wojs, 1993 ). Despite this, Govier and Aziz (1982) recommend the use of the same function of relative roughness for time-independent fl uids as for Newtonian systems.…”
Section: Effect Of Pipe Roughnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…">Literature OverviewIn the past years, many scholars studied the effect of wall roughness on the flow in pipes, fans, compressors, microchannels. In order to study the effect of wall roughness in turbulent pipe flow, Hemeida [17] developed an equation for estimating the thickness of the laminar sublayer in turbulent pipe flow of pseudoplastic fluids and found that the turbulent pipe flow could be divided into two regions: smooth wall and rough wall turbulence. The roughness Reynolds number was used to determine the smooth wall turbulence and rough wall turbulence regions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%