“…The included studies’ quality scores ranged from 4 to 9 out of 10: one study ( Zhou et al, 2018 ) received a score of 9, eight studies ( Liao et al, 2016 ; Ma et al, 2017 ; Wu et al, 2019 , 2022 ; Wang et al, 2020 ; Jie et al, 2021 ; Liu J. W. et al, 2021 ; Zhu S. Q. et al, 2021 ) received a score of 8, 16 studies ( Xiong et al, 2012 ; Liang et al, 2015 ; Fu et al, 2016a ; Fu et al, 2016b ; Xi et al, 2016 ; Yu, 2016 ; Liu N. G. et al, 2018 ; Wan et al, 2019 ; Zhang et al, 2019a ; Zhang et al, 2019b ; Wang, 2020 ; Chen, 2021 ; Liu H. et al, 2021 ; Zeng et al, 2021 ; Zhu D. Y. et al, 2021 ; Qin et al, 2022 ) received a score of 7, four studies ( Liang, 2015 ; Lin and Xu, 2019 ; Chen et al, 2020 ; Liu D. et al, 2021 ) received a score of 6, three studies ( Wu et al, 2018 ; Liu, 2019 ; Wan et al, 2021 ) received a score of 5, and three studies ( Bao et al, 2011 ; Liu D. et al, 2017 ; Wang D. et al, 2021 ) received a score of 4. There was no research that reported on the sample size calculation.…”