2023
DOI: 10.1007/s12540-023-01532-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Warm Rolling on the Structure and Tensile Properties of a Metastable Fe-Based Medium Entropy Alloy

Hyojin Park,
Jungwan Lee,
Rae Eon Kim
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…temperatures. [15,16] The purpose of the warm rolling method is not to utilize a strain aging mechanism, but to obtain a heterogeneous microstructure by rolling at warm temperatures of 400-700 °C. Metallic materials produced through warm rolling method have an additional strengthening contribution called heterodeformation-induced strengthening due to local differences in pre-existing dislocation density.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…temperatures. [15,16] The purpose of the warm rolling method is not to utilize a strain aging mechanism, but to obtain a heterogeneous microstructure by rolling at warm temperatures of 400-700 °C. Metallic materials produced through warm rolling method have an additional strengthening contribution called heterodeformation-induced strengthening due to local differences in pre-existing dislocation density.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most rolling/ pressing methods, including the warm rolling method, have a relatively high dislocation density than as-annealed counterparts, which improves strength while simultaneously decreasing elongation. For example, Park et al [15] further improved YS by %131.7% and UTS by %23.0% compared to the as-annealed state through warm rolling method for Fe-Co-Ni-Cr alloy, but sacrificed UEL by %85.0%. In contrast, the in situ strain aging process exhibited relatively small improvements in YS and UTS of %10.7% and %4.8%, respectively, but there was little decrease in UEL (%6.7% reduction in elongation).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%