2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.09.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of wastewater colloids on membrane removal of antibiotic resistance genes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thermophilic anaerobic sludge digestion appears particularly promising and may achieve superior ARG removal relative to mesophilic digestion, potentially because of the much narrower host ecology of the microorganisms (Diehl and LaPara 2010; Ma et al 2011). More advanced treatment technologies (e.g., membrane separation) could be applied to retain bacterial cells, including their genetic material (Riquelme Breazeal et al 2013). In addition, ozone has been proposed to disinfect ARBs and destroy ARGs (Dodd 2012).…”
Section: Issues and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermophilic anaerobic sludge digestion appears particularly promising and may achieve superior ARG removal relative to mesophilic digestion, potentially because of the much narrower host ecology of the microorganisms (Diehl and LaPara 2010; Ma et al 2011). More advanced treatment technologies (e.g., membrane separation) could be applied to retain bacterial cells, including their genetic material (Riquelme Breazeal et al 2013). In addition, ozone has been proposed to disinfect ARBs and destroy ARGs (Dodd 2012).…”
Section: Issues and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Membrane (100 kDa) filtration of wastewater spiked with plasmid-associated ARGs resulted in 1-to 2-log reduction of ARGs. 28 Therefore, a membrane bioreactor could result in ARGs removal due to physical filtration alone. During the biological process, ARGs increased in an aerobic bioreactor in one full-scale study, but were significantly lower in MBR filtrate compared to the wastewater treated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both MBRs in the aforementioned studies employed membranes with pore sizes in the ultrafiltration (UF) range, which are generally larger than the average plasmid that would represent extracellular ARGs. However, given that a previous analysis of the mechanisms affecting ARG removal by membrane filtration revealed a positive correlation between colloid presence in UF membrane retentates and ARG removal rates [81], it is likely that this phenomenon is also responsible for the higher ARG LRVs in the MBR systems studied. Furthermore, the development of membrane biofilms has been shown to improve water quality parameters of MBR effluents such as COD removal [82], which can potentially serve as an additional mechanism for the removal of ARGs from wastewater effluents.…”
Section: The Role Of Membrane-based Treatment On Antibiotic Resistancmentioning
confidence: 90%