2011
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.396-398.1950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Water-Saving Irrigation on CH<sub>4</sub> Emissions from Rice Fields

Abstract: Although water saving irrigation (WSI) has been widely used in China, there is limited understanding on the effect of such a practice on the CH4emission in rice fields. Consequently it is difficult to estimate the regionSubscript textal distribution of CH4emissions in space and time from rice fields across China. Two water treatments (controlled irrigation (CI), a routine WSI practice in China, and a traditional continuous flooded irrigation (FI)) were used to examine diurnal and seasonal variations of CH4emis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Leaf area index is the sum of total green leaf areas per unit land area. The method of determining chlorophyll content was as described by Li et al (2012), the total chlorophyll content was determined by the sum of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and carotene content.…”
Section: 31mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leaf area index is the sum of total green leaf areas per unit land area. The method of determining chlorophyll content was as described by Li et al (2012), the total chlorophyll content was determined by the sum of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and carotene content.…”
Section: 31mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it can be said that the use of efficient fertilizers positively affects the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, since paddy production with drip irrigation is completely flooded production (Ramesh et al, 2019). Li (2012) compared the emission of methane gas (CH4) with conventional production in a watersaving method. In water-saving applications, methane emission was found 39-85% less than applications with flood irrigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%