2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2014.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of water vapor on the pore structure and sulfation of CaO

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the furnace reached the set temperature and was purged by synthetic flue gas for 15 min, the sample (80 ± 2 mg) was loaded into a quartz boat, and its mass was continually measured by a mass monitor (accuracy 0.1 mg) and recorded by computer. Our previous work with this system showed that it has sufficient accuracy for this type of study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…After the furnace reached the set temperature and was purged by synthetic flue gas for 15 min, the sample (80 ± 2 mg) was loaded into a quartz boat, and its mass was continually measured by a mass monitor (accuracy 0.1 mg) and recorded by computer. Our previous work with this system showed that it has sufficient accuracy for this type of study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To increase the sulfation rate, a smaller particle size, higher SO 2 concentration and optimum temperature are suggested . Limestone particles in a CFB are recirculated and sulfated for periods of hours, and the long‐term sulfation reaction can usually be divided into a fast‐reaction stage and a slow‐reaction stage . The common consensus is that the fast‐sulfation stage is controlled by the intrinsic reaction rate or SO 2 diffusion, while in the slow stage the diffusion through the CaSO 4 product layer is the major resistance to sulfation …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The formed calcium sulfate (CaSO 4 ) layer is porous due to carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) production which escapes during the reaction (Eqn (1)). The parameters affecting the overall rate and conversion of reactions (Eqns (1) and (3)) are as follows: temperature ( T ), pressure ( P ), partial pressure of the gaseous reactants (PSO2, PO2), diameter or general geometry of the CaCO 3 particle ( d p ), structural characteristics of limestone, reaction time ( t ) and water vapor. Capture of sulfur (S) by sulfur trioxide (SO 3 ) formation does not have a significant impact, due to the small degree of conversion of SO 2 to SO 3 in non‐catalytic conditions .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%