2021
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.35331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Wearing a Novel Electronic Wearable Device on Hand Hygiene Compliance Among Health Care Workers

Abstract: Key Points Question Does providing real-time feedback on a simplified hand hygiene (HH) action with a novel electronic wearable device improve the compliance with the “5 Moments” and the quality of the HH action according to World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines? Findings In this stepped-wedge, cluster randomized clinical trial involving 97 health care workers at the University of Geneva Hospitals, the device did not improve compliance with the “5 Mome… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recent study in the geriatric hospital, the use of a novel electronic wearable device did not change the HHC among healthcare workers. However, the use of the device increased the median duration of hand rubbing (from 6.5 to 8 s) and the volume of alcohol-based hand rub (from 1.12 to 1.71 mL) [32]. Although electronic surveillance systems seem to be free of the Hawthorne effect, further studies are needed to determine standardized metrics for quantifying system performance differences among electronic HH monitoring systems [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent study in the geriatric hospital, the use of a novel electronic wearable device did not change the HHC among healthcare workers. However, the use of the device increased the median duration of hand rubbing (from 6.5 to 8 s) and the volume of alcohol-based hand rub (from 1.12 to 1.71 mL) [32]. Although electronic surveillance systems seem to be free of the Hawthorne effect, further studies are needed to determine standardized metrics for quantifying system performance differences among electronic HH monitoring systems [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Study characteristics related to the population, interventions, and outcomes for the 36 included studies are provided in Table S2 in Multimedia Appendix 2 [ 15 , 19 , 21 , 22 , 30 - 60 , 62 ]. The 36 unique articles included 2 (6%) RCTs [ 53 , 54 ] and 34 (94%) quasi-experimental studies [ 15 , 19 , 21 , 22 , 30 - 52 , 55 - 60 , 62 ] (8 non-RCTs and 26 one-group pretest-posttest quasi-experimental designs). Studies were published between 2013 and 2022, apart from 2 studies published in 2008 [ 48 , 58 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All participating HCWs completed a previously used and tested questionnaire on hand hygiene and personal habits. 24 Forty-two volunteers were recruited to complete the trial, of which 41 were nurses or nursing assistants; 37 completed both intervention periods. Five participants were not included in the study, dropping out due to scheduling con icts, changing their workplace, or their data was not included due to non-compliance with the intervention.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%