2019
DOI: 10.1007/s13197-019-04145-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of wet and dry milling on the functional properties of whole sorghum grain flour and kafirin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rao et al (2018) indicated that hammer milled sorghum flour of larger particle size (180 and 251 μm) resulted in higher quality sorghum biscuits due to smaller particle size flour and increased darkness, hardness, and weight of cookies. Amoura et al (2020) found significant differences in the extraction of sorghum kafirin and its functional properties whether wet or dry milling was used.…”
Section: Practical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rao et al (2018) indicated that hammer milled sorghum flour of larger particle size (180 and 251 μm) resulted in higher quality sorghum biscuits due to smaller particle size flour and increased darkness, hardness, and weight of cookies. Amoura et al (2020) found significant differences in the extraction of sorghum kafirin and its functional properties whether wet or dry milling was used.…”
Section: Practical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Rao et al (2018) indicated that hammer milled sorghum flour of larger particle size (180 and 251 μm) resulted in higher quality sorghum biscuits due to smaller particle size flour and increased darkness, hardness, and weight of cookies. Amoura et al (2020) found significant differences in the extraction of sorghum kafirin and its functional properties whether wet or dry milling was used. In contrast, Langó et al (2018) found no significant differences in the yield and chemical components of sorghum flour as compared to roller milling of sorghum and sieving, with or without decortication.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.7.8 Foaming capacity and stability. FC and FS were determined following the method of Amoura et al 44 Suspensions were made with 0.2% (w/v) protein in 9.0 mM sodium phosphate buffer containing 35 mM NaCl at pH 7.0. Suspensions (100 mL) were placed in a beaker and mixed at 2000 rpm for 100 s at room temperature (23 °C).…”
Section: Freeze-drying Of Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are underlying issues that need to be addressed, including non‐water solubility, which makes isolation difficult and expensive, as well as concerns related to protein digestibility and largely unknown functionality in food applications. Further research is necessary to facilitate commercial production and usage in food applications, including its incorporation into formulations of high‐quality protein‐rich and gluten‐free alternatives (Amoura et al., 2020). Novel protein sources like hairless canary seeds (Abdel‐Aal et al., 2021), kernza seeds ( Thinopyrum intermedium ) (Marcus & Fox, 2022), and karanj seeds ( Pongamia pinnata ) that contain exceptionally high protein contents should also be explored for protein separation.…”
Section: Benefits and Challenges In Cereal And Pulse Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%