2010
DOI: 10.1007/s13157-010-0032-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Wetland Enhancement on Parasites of Juvenile Yellow Perch

Abstract: Impoundments and dams are frequently used in wetlands to stabilize water levels and maintain breeding habitat for waterfowl. The objective of the study was to examine the effect of reduced water level fluctuations and connectivity on fish parasitism in wetlands caused by the installation of such structures. We compared parasites of juvenile yellow perch (Perca flavescens) from two enhanced wetlands where water level is regulated and where connection with the main channel occurs only during spring flood (enhanc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 53 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These observations therefore support our assumption that fish collected at spawning sites were representative of the whole population, which dispersed in the lake postspawning. Seven sites where primary consumers were collected were situated in the spring high‐water areas where water then completely receded after a period of c. 1 month (Bertrand, Marcogliese & Magnan 2010). We excluded these sites from our calculations of feeding ranges of perch because their contribution to total fish carbon over the whole year is likely to be minimal.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These observations therefore support our assumption that fish collected at spawning sites were representative of the whole population, which dispersed in the lake postspawning. Seven sites where primary consumers were collected were situated in the spring high‐water areas where water then completely receded after a period of c. 1 month (Bertrand, Marcogliese & Magnan 2010). We excluded these sites from our calculations of feeding ranges of perch because their contribution to total fish carbon over the whole year is likely to be minimal.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%