2014
DOI: 10.4236/fns.2014.511108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Wholemeal Durum Wheat Varieties on Bread Quality

Abstract: In this work the effect of six varieties of durum wheat semolina on the bread physico-chemical and sensorial properties was addressed. In particular, whole grains of durum wheat (Anco Marzio, Claudio, Core, Iride, Saragolla and Cappelli) were finely milled by using an ancient stone milling system. Texture analysis was carried out on both dough and bread samples to evaluate their firmness. Furthermore, tomographic analysis was performed on the bread samples in order to provide a more detailed view of their text… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This reflected the significant, and more than fourfold, higher insoluble fibre for RDW and doubled soluble fibre for RDW, compared to DW. These data are in agreement with the literature for rye and wheat (Juntunen et al 2003;Danza et al 2014). With respect to DW, the addition of WS resulted in an increasing trend for insoluble, and hence total, dietary fibre, both of which reached significance for WS-30, accompanied by decreased soluble fibre.…”
Section: Dietary Fibre and Glycaemic Indexsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This reflected the significant, and more than fourfold, higher insoluble fibre for RDW and doubled soluble fibre for RDW, compared to DW. These data are in agreement with the literature for rye and wheat (Juntunen et al 2003;Danza et al 2014). With respect to DW, the addition of WS resulted in an increasing trend for insoluble, and hence total, dietary fibre, both of which reached significance for WS-30, accompanied by decreased soluble fibre.…”
Section: Dietary Fibre and Glycaemic Indexsupporting
confidence: 92%