“…KAS, Tang, Starink and Vyazovkin methods give similar values of E˛, while FWO method gives values of E˛lower than the values obtained by the other isoconversional methods by maximum difference of 1.13%. This close agreement between KAS, Tang, Starink and Vyazovkin isoconversional methods was also reported by many authors [18,20,23,[58][59][60][61]. It is evident from the observed temperature dependence of the activation energy in the present glass that the amorphous to crystalline transformation cannot be described by a single-step mechanism.…”