Effect of working gap and circumferential speed on the performance of magnetic abrasive finishing process

Jain, V.K.; Kumar, Prashant; Behera, Prasanna Kumar; Jayswal, S. C.

doi:10.1016/s0043-1648(01)00642-1

Cited by 159 publications

(78 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Jain et al [49] investigated the effect of the working gap and circumferential speed on the performance of the MAF process. Their experimental work was performed with a stainless steel cylindrical workpiece (48 × 50 mm) and an input current of 2.5 A.…”

Section: (B) Maf With a Direct Currentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This effect will further escalate with an increase in the circumferential speed. Jain et al [49] evaluated the effect of the working gap and the circumferential speed on material removal and surface finish improvement, showing that higher speeds and smaller working gaps produce a better surface finish. Exceptions were found for working gaps smaller than 0.5 mm because of the restrained space, which compromises abrasive renovation.…”

Section: Working Gapmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Review of Superfinishing by the Magnetic Abrasive Finishing Process

Heng¹,

Kim²,

Mun³

2017

High Speed Machining

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recent developments in the engineering industry have created a demand for advanced materials with superior mechanical properties and high-quality surface finishes. Some of the conventional finishing methods such as lapping, grinding, honing, and polishing are now being replaced by non-conventional finishing processes. Magnetic Abrasive Finishing (MAF) is a non-conventional superfinishing process in which magnetic abrasive particles interact with a magnetic field in the finishing zone to remove materials to achieve very high surface finishing and deburring simultaneously. In this review paper, the working principles, processing parameters, and current limitations for the MAF process are examined via reviewing important work in the literature. Additionally, future developments of the MAF process are discussed.

show abstract

Section: (B) Maf With a Direct Currentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Working Gapmentioning

confidence: 99%

Review of Superfinishing by the Magnetic Abrasive Finishing Process

Heng¹,

Kim²,

Mun³

2017

High Speed Machining

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Khairy first deduced the mathematical formula of grinding pressure and magnetic flux density, and then experimentally studied the effect of grinding pressure on surface roughness and observed the removal effect of edge burrs [8]. Jain et al used an intermittent magnetic field to investigate the effect of work gap and workpiece speed on surface roughness and material removal [9]. Kim used WC-Co magnetic abrasives for SUS304 tubes to investigate workpiece speed, abrasive fluid content and vibration frequency on the surface roughness [10,11].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Study on Precision Polishing Technology Combining Electrophoresis and Magnetic Finishing

Liu

Yeh

et al. 2016

IJMSA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:The aim of this paper is to improve the quality of surface roughness of precision molds, which is difficult to control in the traditional polishing technology, and to provide a kind of equipment which is simple and easy to operate in order to obtain a high precision in surface finishing and polishing. The combination of magnetic force polishing and electrophoretic polishing is mainly to combine the magnetic grinding mechanism with the electrophoretic deposition method to conduct finishing and polishing experiments. From the experimental results we can see that the combination of magnetic force and electrophoretic polishing can make the original roughness of the discharge surface of 1.7µm down to 0.08µm which is mirror effect after improving for 20 minutes. The experimental results show that the precision polishing combined with electrophoresis and magnetic grinding can effectively improve the surface roughness and therefore reduce technical and personnel training costs, shorten the production cycle time, and thus improve production efficiency. It can be concluded as a quite competitive technology in the industry.

show abstract

“…with abrasives (SiC, Al 2 O 3 , Cr 2 O 3 , diamond powder etc.). MAPs can be used as bonded, unbonded or loosely bonded [1]. Bonded magnetic abrasives are prepared by sintering ferromagnetic particles and abrasives at very high pressure and temperature in an inert gas atmosphere and then crushed and sieve to specific size.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fem Based Modeling of Cylindrical-Magnetic Abrasive Finishing (C-Maf) Process Using Unbounded Magnetic Abrasives

2016

Arimpie - 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Effect of working gap and circumferential speed on the performance of magnetic abrasive finishing process

Cited by 159 publications

References 6 publications

Review of Superfinishing by the Magnetic Abrasive Finishing Process

Review of Superfinishing by the Magnetic Abrasive Finishing Process

Study on Precision Polishing Technology Combining Electrophoresis and Magnetic Finishing

Fem Based Modeling of Cylindrical-Magnetic Abrasive Finishing (C-Maf) Process Using Unbounded Magnetic Abrasives

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About