2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.fluid.2013.11.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of ZrO2 nanoparticles on the interfacial behavior of surfactant solutions at air–water and n-heptane–water interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
43
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
43
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As the high concentration slug moves through the reservoir, it is diluted by the formation's fluids and the process reverts to a lowconcentration flood. There are numerous mathematical modeling and experimental studies of various aspects of surfactant flooding in the literature [57][58][59][60][61][62][63].…”
Section: Surfactantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the high concentration slug moves through the reservoir, it is diluted by the formation's fluids and the process reverts to a lowconcentration flood. There are numerous mathematical modeling and experimental studies of various aspects of surfactant flooding in the literature [57][58][59][60][61][62][63].…”
Section: Surfactantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, according to the results of Zargartalebi et al (), the IFT between the SDS solutions with small inclusions of either hydrophobic or hydrophilic nanoparticles (1000 ppm SiO 2 ) and oil significantly decreased when the surfactant concentration was below the critical micelle concentration (CMC). Contrary to this, Esmaeilzadeh et al () observed a slight IFT reduction between diluted surfactant solutions with 0.5 wt.% ZnO 2 and oil. A further increase of surfactant concentration in solutions showed constant IFT for all nanoparticles concentrations tested (Esmaeilzadeh et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Contrary to this, Esmaeilzadeh et al () observed a slight IFT reduction between diluted surfactant solutions with 0.5 wt.% ZnO 2 and oil. A further increase of surfactant concentration in solutions showed constant IFT for all nanoparticles concentrations tested (Esmaeilzadeh et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This can be attributed to the electrostatic repulsive interaction between the nanoparticles and the surfactant that promoted the diffusion of the surfactant towards the interface [66]. Nanoparticles can act as a carriers of surfactant molecules towards the interface, but at high concentration the nanoparticles attract the surfactant molecules which can lead to aggregation of the surfactant molecules [67]. One of the major challenges of nanomaterial design is the control of colloidal stability of the particles to prevent aggregation and damaging interaction with the surrounding, as tiny particles tends to aggregate and form bigger particle cluster.…”
Section: Challenges Of Nanoparticles In Reducing Iftmentioning
confidence: 99%