2007
DOI: 10.1134/s1063785007110260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of γ-radiation on the optical properties of soda-lime-silicate glasses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another important difference is the thermal expansion coefficient, which is six times larger for sodalime glass than for silica glass. There is also a difference in the optical band gap: about 3.2 eV for sodalime glass [39] and 7.5 eV for silica glass [6]. The properties of both glasses are summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Pump Energy-dependence Of a Pressure Wavementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another important difference is the thermal expansion coefficient, which is six times larger for sodalime glass than for silica glass. There is also a difference in the optical band gap: about 3.2 eV for sodalime glass [39] and 7.5 eV for silica glass [6]. The properties of both glasses are summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Pump Energy-dependence Of a Pressure Wavementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This should be due to differences in the sound velocity in the glasses (5.93 km/s in a silica glass and 5.5 km/s in a sodalime glass), because the TrL oscillation is originated from the propagation of a pressure wave. To compare the amplitude of the TrL oscillation, we defined an oscillation amplitude (A osci ) as shown in Figure 4(c), that is, the difference of the signal intensity at [32,37], thermal expansion coefficients α [32,36], band gaps E g [6,39], refractive indices n [36], and glass transition temperatures T g [38] of silica glass and sodalime glass [32]. η (Pa·s) at 600…”
Section: Pump Energy-dependence Of a Pressure Wavementioning
confidence: 99%