2021
DOI: 10.1017/ice.2021.506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect on the reduction of bacterial load after surgical hand antisepsis with triclosan 0.5% compared to triclosan 0.5% followed by 70% alcoholic solution

Abstract: Triclosan 0.5% by scrubbing does not meet the UNE-EN12791 criteria to be used in the surgical hand preparation (SHP). Triclosan 0.5% by scrubbing followed by ethanol 70% hand rubbing is suitable without the additional characteristic of sustained effect. This limited effectiveness implies that triclosan should be avoided in SHP given the restrictions on its use in consumer antiseptic products. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT04538365).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the priority of surgical hand preparation should be based on the effectiveness of the process rather than on any personal preference and, in this sense, the efficacy of hand scrubbing is uncertain when assessed against EN 12791 [20][21][22][23]. Reapplication of the scrub or a combination of the scrub with an alcohol-based rub to improve the effectiveness of surgical hand scrubbing, prolonging the inhibition of bacterial growth on the skin for hours, is supported by multiple efficacy studies not guided by EN 12791 [9,17,19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, the priority of surgical hand preparation should be based on the effectiveness of the process rather than on any personal preference and, in this sense, the efficacy of hand scrubbing is uncertain when assessed against EN 12791 [20][21][22][23]. Reapplication of the scrub or a combination of the scrub with an alcohol-based rub to improve the effectiveness of surgical hand scrubbing, prolonging the inhibition of bacterial growth on the skin for hours, is supported by multiple efficacy studies not guided by EN 12791 [9,17,19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the results of in vitro tests and non-standardized clinical trials, health professionals consider medicated soaps to be effective [9,[17][18][19], but the antimicrobial activity of these antiseptics differs significantly under practical conditions, such as those proposed by EN 12791 [20][21][22][23]. Medicated soaps containing PVP 10%, TC 0.5-1% or PCMX 3% do not meet the non-inferiority criteria of EN 12791 and should not be used in surgical hand scrubbing [20][21][22][23]. In this context, CHG 4% soaps have resulted in an inferior immediate effect compared to n-propanol, or non-inferiority without the sustained effect expected for this long-lasting agent when applied for 3 to 5 min [18,[20][21][22]24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations