1985
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.54.1222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective-Action Expansion in Perturbation Theory

Abstract: I present a systematic method for the development of the effective-action expansion in perturbation theory. The multiderivative terms beyond the effective potential can be evaluated in a direct and simple manner relying only on the familiar momentum space and Feynman propagator. I have used the self-coupled scalar field to explain the details of this new formulation. The effectiveaction expansion for this model in the one-loop approximation is evaluated up to the terms containing four derivatives. This method … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
62
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the issues recently arisen involves the widely used technique to perform the functional integration set up more than thirty years ago by the works of Aitchison and Fraser [11][12][13][14], Chan [15,16], Gaillard [17] and Cheyette [18]. As implemented by refs.…”
Section: Jhep09(2016)156mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the issues recently arisen involves the widely used technique to perform the functional integration set up more than thirty years ago by the works of Aitchison and Fraser [11][12][13][14], Chan [15,16], Gaillard [17] and Cheyette [18]. As implemented by refs.…”
Section: Jhep09(2016)156mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CDE assumes in the CW potential the double derivatives (indicated by 0 ) to the beyond SM fields acting on the Lagrangian potential terms can be decomposed as V 00 ¼ M 2 þ δV 00 , where M 2 is some large constant squared mass term which is irrelevant to Higgs vacuum expectation value (VEV), and δV 00 on the other hand captures the spacetime dependent part (namely the SM Higgs) of potential terms, with not only the physical Higgs boson but the Nambu-Goldstone modes before electroweak symmetry breaking. At last ∼ generally indicates a Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff expansion with covariant derivatives and ∂ ∂p s, which can be understand as introducing spacetime dependence in the momentum space [8] (and the covariant generalization in gauge field ∂ → D ¼ ∂ − igA is given in [9,10], in which theG terms arise).…”
Section: Formulismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gh, 11.15.Kc, 11.27.+d A renewed interest in the computation of quantum energies around classical configurations has recently arose. See for example [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] and references therein. The methods used to approach the problem include the derivative expanssion method [1], the scattering phase shift technique [2], the mode regularization method [4], the zeta-function regularization technique [5] and also the dimensional regularization method [7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See for example [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] and references therein. The methods used to approach the problem include the derivative expanssion method [1], the scattering phase shift technique [2], the mode regularization method [4], the zeta-function regularization technique [5] and also the dimensional regularization method [7]. In this letter I will give a very simple derivation of the one loop renormalized soliton quantum mass correction in 1+1 dimensional scalar field theory models, using the scattering phase shift technique.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%