2000
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-015-9341-0_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective and Efficient Modeling for Streamflow Forecasting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are a number of ANN architecture types, the use of which depends on the intended purpose (Tadeusiewicz 1993;Osowski 2013). In streamflow modelling the most commonly used type of network is the feed-forward multilayer perceptron, also known as MLP (Gupta et al 2000). The process of the ANN model creation can be divided into several steps: (1) collection of the representative data that will be needed to establish the network; (2) definition of the network structure and processing features; (3) learning of the network; and (4) results verification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a number of ANN architecture types, the use of which depends on the intended purpose (Tadeusiewicz 1993;Osowski 2013). In streamflow modelling the most commonly used type of network is the feed-forward multilayer perceptron, also known as MLP (Gupta et al 2000). The process of the ANN model creation can be divided into several steps: (1) collection of the representative data that will be needed to establish the network; (2) definition of the network structure and processing features; (3) learning of the network; and (4) results verification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time series forecasting has an important role for water resources planning and management. Conventionally, researchers have employed traditional methods such as AR, ARMA, ARIMA, etc, (Gupta & Sorooshian, 2000;Cigizoglu & Kisi, 2005;Cigizoglu, 2008). The daily discharge data, from actual field observed data in Ruta Ranquil (Colorado River), was employed first time to develop several models investigated in this study, explore the performance of the ANN approach for the estimation of river flow, and compare its result to those of the autoregression technique (AR).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former are specifically designed to mathematically simulate the subprocesses and physical mechanisms that govern the hydrological cycle, usually incorporating simplified forms of physical laws and being generally nonlinear, timeinvariant, and deterministic. These techniques, although they use representative parameters of watershed characteristics (Gupta et al, 2000), they ignore the spatial distribution, the time-varying properties and the stochastic nature of the rainfall. Yang & Michel (2000) state that conceptual watershed models are reliable in forecasting the most important features of the hydrograph; but, the implementation and calibration of such a model can typically present some difficulty, because it requires sophisticated mathematical tools, significant amounts of calibration data and some degree of expertise and experience with the model (Zhang et al, 1998;Sudheer et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This NN configuration has been used successfully in many water resources systems applications and shows generally good abilities to model hydrological time series (Chakraborty et al, 1992;Gupta et al, 2000;ASCE-TCAANNH, 2000).…”
Section: Topologymentioning
confidence: 99%