Effective and ovarian dose in PA conventional and rotational 3D hysterosalpingography examinations

Efstathopoulos, Efstathios; Charalambatou, Paraskevi; Tsalafoutas, Ioannis A.; Kelekis, Alexis; Antonakos, Ioannis; Brountzos, Elias; Kelekis, D.

doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2013.01.004

Cited by 6 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Among others, Peruzzo Cornetto et al tabulated data for 23 procedures in an Italian hospital, Compagnone et al published data from a different Italian hospital for nine interventional procedures, Dauer et al published P KA data for 43 interventional fluoroscopy procedures at a single U.S. institution, Bundy et al did the same for 12 procedures at a different U.S. medical center, Erskine et al published P KA data for 32 interventional fluoroscopy procedures in Australia, Étard et al’s report contains data from France for 15 procedures, Pitton et al published data for 17 interventional vascular procedures at a German hospital, Schmitz et al reported data on biliary interventions at 23 different facilities, and Ruiz‐Cruces et al reported data for seven interventional procedures performed at eight hospitals in Spain. Many other published studies were also consulted to estimate one or more of P KA , E , and DC E …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Many other published studies were also consulted to estimate one or more of P KA , E, and DC E . 7,11,12,14,15,[17][18][19]21,[24][25][26][27][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63] Published values of P KA are included in Table I. Table II provides data for E and Table III provides data for DC E .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The dose for "hysterosalpingography" includes hysterosalpingography and fallopian tube recanalization. [24][25][26] The "biliary" category includes biliary drainage, biliary stent placement and other unspecified biliary procedures. Relatively recent data are available for these procedures.…”

Section: B Procedures Categoriesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Review of air kerma‐area product, effective dose and dose conversion coefficients for non‐cardiac interventional fluoroscopy procedures

Miller

2020

Medical Physics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose To provide current data on average air kerma‐area product (PKA) and effective dose (E) for noncardiac interventional fluoroscopy procedures and suggested values of dose coefficients (DCE) for conversion of PKA to estimates of effective dose. Methods A PubMed literature search covering the time period from 2006 to August 2019 was performed to obtain recent data on PKA, E and DCE for interventional fluoroscopy procedures. Results There is very wide variation in the reported values of PKA, E, and DCE in the literature. A number of factors are involved in this variability and the resultant uncertainty in average values of these dose quantities. Conclusions The values of PKA, average E and suggested DCE presented here can be of use for comparison of the radiation detriment from different procedures and may be useful for categorizing detriment within an order of magnitude or so. They do not represent actual or expected radiation dose or detriment from any specific procedure or for a specific patient and should be not be used as such.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Review of air kerma‐area product, effective dose and dose conversion coefficients for non‐cardiac interventional fluoroscopy procedures

Miller

2020

Medical Physics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Appropriate selection of exposure parameters minimizes the size of radiation dose administered to the patient during the examination. The size of the dose depends on the operator of the X-ray apparatus [4,5] and even the smallest doses of radiation may increase the probability of cancer development in the future so these risks should be minimized [6].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Physical parameters affecting the distribution of X-ray dose during hysterosalpingography

Kasprzyk,

Chmaj-Wierzchowska,

Jurczyk

2020

Clin. Exp. Obstet. Gynecol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Hysterosalpingography (HSG) is based on the administration of a shading agent to the uterine cavity and fallopian tubes using a Schulze apparatus. An X-ray beam (X) is then directed at the abdominal area of the patient and diagnostic images are obtained for evaluation. The radiation beam and its mode of administration have a decisive influence on the radiation dose to which the patient is exposed. The aim of this study was to determine the physical parameters of this exposure in such a way that the dose distribution during the HSG examination was the most beneficial for the patient. Materials and Methods: Measurements to evaluate the effect of exposure parameters on the quality of radiological images obtained during HSG in slim and obese patients were made in 216 repetitions of the standard HSG test. Additional research data was obtained from measurements made in the X-ray laboratory at the Clinical Hospital. Results: The comparison of all measurements made for experimental models simulating a slim and obese patient demonstrated that the dose distribution most advantageous for the patient is obtained for pulsations of an X-ray tube for PPS = 6, regardless of the thickness of the patient. Conclusions: The image quality and size of the radiation dose received during the HSG examination depends on the individual characteristics of the patient. During the measurements performed in order to compare the exposure conditions set by the automatic exposure control (AEC) system and the resulting dose, this study demonstrated that the dose distribution most advantageous for the patients is obtained for pulsations on an X-ray tube for PPS = 6, regardless of the thickness of the patient.

show abstract

Conversion factors for effective dose and organ doses with the air Kerma area product in hysterosalpingography

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Effective and ovarian dose in PA conventional and rotational 3D hysterosalpingography examinations

Cited by 6 publications

References 25 publications

Review of air kerma‐area product, effective dose and dose conversion coefficients for non‐cardiac interventional fluoroscopy procedures

Review of air kerma‐area product, effective dose and dose conversion coefficients for non‐cardiac interventional fluoroscopy procedures

Physical parameters affecting the distribution of X-ray dose during hysterosalpingography

Conversion factors for effective dose and organ doses with the air Kerma area product in hysterosalpingography

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About