2008
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.4434-07.2008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective and Structural Connectivity in the Human Auditory Cortex

Abstract: Language processing involves multiple neuronal structures in the human auditory cortex. Although a variety of neuroimaging and mapping techniques have been implemented to better understand language processing at the level of the auditory cortex, much is unknown regarding how and by what pathways these structures interact during essential tasks such as sentence comprehension. In this study, the effective and structural connectivity at the level of the auditory cortex were investigated. First, blood oxygenation … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
52
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
6
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In conjunction with the MTG the STS has also been associated, with accessing the mental lexicon [Kotz et al, 2002;Obleser and Kotz, 2010]. Previous functional and structural connectivity studies reported strong connections between auditory cortex regions and the anterior and posterior STS/STG [Caclin and Fonlupt, 2006;Kumar et al, 2007;Upadhyay et al, 2008]. This is compatible with the current findings of the distribution of perceptually-based and grammar-based processes in AC and STS/STG.…”
Section: Neural Imprints Of Grammar-based Processessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In conjunction with the MTG the STS has also been associated, with accessing the mental lexicon [Kotz et al, 2002;Obleser and Kotz, 2010]. Previous functional and structural connectivity studies reported strong connections between auditory cortex regions and the anterior and posterior STS/STG [Caclin and Fonlupt, 2006;Kumar et al, 2007;Upadhyay et al, 2008]. This is compatible with the current findings of the distribution of perceptually-based and grammar-based processes in AC and STS/STG.…”
Section: Neural Imprints Of Grammar-based Processessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…More recently, effective connectivity techniques, such as Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM) and Granger Causality, have been used to make stronger inferences about the directionality of influence between brain regions (for tutorial reviews see Stephan et al, (2010) and Friston, Moran, & Seth (2013)). Using Granger Causality, Upadhyay et al, (2008) found that spoken sentences engaged two streams of processing emanating from primary auditory cortex -one to the anterior STG and the other to posterior STG -paralleling findings from studies of non-human primates indicating multiple processing streams. Leff et al, (2008) identified preferential responses to intelligible 2-word phrases in left posterior and anterior STS, and pars orbitalis of the left IFG.…”
Section: (A) Understanding the Temporal Hierarchy: Anterior Versus Posupporting
confidence: 55%
“…These networks included a language network, a right frontoparietal control network, a posterior cingulate network, a DMN that comprised mostly anterior with some posterior activation also, a separate posterior DMN, a set maintenance network, a dorsal attention network (Fox et al, 2006), a sensorimotor network, a cerebellum network (Hampson et al, 2002), two distinct visual networks, an auditory network (Upadhyay et al, 2008), and finally a ventral stream network. Seven networks were discarded as either deriving from non-neuronal sources or depicting no known or identifiable spatial neuronal network.…”
Section: Template Icnsmentioning
confidence: 99%