2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2014.04.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective atomic numbers and electron densities of some human tissues and dosimetric materials for mean energies of various radiation sources relevant to radiotherapy and medical applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also the effective mean energy of X-ray photons is approximately 1/3rd of the peak voltage applied. The equivalent mean energy of 6 MV X-ray photons is close to 1.5 MeV (Kurudirek, 2014). Similarly the 16 MV photons of X-rays have mean energy around at 5 MeV.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Also the effective mean energy of X-ray photons is approximately 1/3rd of the peak voltage applied. The equivalent mean energy of 6 MV X-ray photons is close to 1.5 MeV (Kurudirek, 2014). Similarly the 16 MV photons of X-rays have mean energy around at 5 MeV.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…A similar method used in previous works was adopted for calculation of Z ef f and N e for heavy charged particles [21][22][23][24]. Briefly, a Z-wise interpolation procedure has been adopted to obtain Z ef f for heavy charged particles.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the all variations can be clearly explained by the Z dependence of total atomic cross sections thus effective atomic numbers as Z [4][5] for photoelectric absorption, Z for Compton scattering and Z 2 for pair production.…”
Section: Büyükyıldızmentioning
confidence: 99%