2017 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icc.2017.7997291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective capacity analysis for underlay cognitive satellite-terrestrial networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiuser interference detection and cancelation on the user side [15,16]: Advanced precoding schemes at the transmitter side Exclusive regulation of spectrum assignment [17] Cognitive radio-based spectrum sharing between HTS and terrestrial systems with interference management [18,19] [ 20,21]: Various interference scenarios and cognitive modes in cognitive satellite terrestrial networks [22]: Cognitive zone to guarantee the primary communications [23]: A joint carrier-powerbandwidth allocation scheme [24][25][26]: Power allocation with interference-power constraints One reason for the limited throughput is the inefficient utilization of the deployed spectrum in HTS systems. To increase the bandwidth utilization efficiency, the authors in [8] proposed to dynamically allocate the orthogonal bandwidth based on different traffic demands.…”
Section: Problems Reasons Solutions Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Multiuser interference detection and cancelation on the user side [15,16]: Advanced precoding schemes at the transmitter side Exclusive regulation of spectrum assignment [17] Cognitive radio-based spectrum sharing between HTS and terrestrial systems with interference management [18,19] [ 20,21]: Various interference scenarios and cognitive modes in cognitive satellite terrestrial networks [22]: Cognitive zone to guarantee the primary communications [23]: A joint carrier-powerbandwidth allocation scheme [24][25][26]: Power allocation with interference-power constraints One reason for the limited throughput is the inefficient utilization of the deployed spectrum in HTS systems. To increase the bandwidth utilization efficiency, the authors in [8] proposed to dynamically allocate the orthogonal bandwidth based on different traffic demands.…”
Section: Problems Reasons Solutions Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to ITU-R [17], only a 500 MHz spectrum in the Ka band is exclusively available for HTS, which has been shown to be insufficient to meet the forthcoming demands for broadband satellite services. To alleviate the spectrum scarcity in future satellite communications, employing cognitive radio (CR) technology in satellite communications has emerged as a promising candidate, which is referred as a so-called cognitive satellite-terrestrial network [18,19]. For the cognitive satellite-terrestrial networks, effective resource allocation, which is a key enabling technique to alleviate the mutual interference and ensure the friendly coexistence of two networks, has also been widely studied.…”
Section: Problems Reasons Solutions Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the generalized-K distribution, the shadowing fading is gamma-distributed while the multipath fading is Nakagami-distributed. As illustrated in [25,26], the generalized-K model can properly characterize the satellite channel environment.…”
Section: Satellite Linksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To make the subsequent derivation tractable, we employ the CDF based MGF definition. In this way, the MGF of a random variable can be expressed as [26]…”
Section: Mgf Based Ser and Op Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, with single antenna deployed at the cognitive terrestrial BS, a power allocation scheme and the impact of the spatial distribution of primary transmitters on the cognitive networks were studied in [17]. In [18], the authors studied the outage performance of CSTN with interference temperature constraint at the primary satellite user.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%