“…Combined with the findings of the present study, we argue that Fulmer's personal coaching philosophy (Carless & Douglas, 2011) reveals a story of an educator-coach working within the problematic space of "big-time" intercollegiate athletics, which has long faced heavy criticism (e.g, winning-at-all-costs, detracts from academics, exploitation of labor; Coakley, 2008). The belief that sports can be used as an educational activity appears consistent with other theorizing on the educational foundations of effective coaching (Gearity, 2010), holistic coaching (Cassidy, 2013), and coaching programs such as InSideOut Coaching (Ehrmann et al, 2011) and Double-Goal Coaching (Thompson, 2003). While the coach's role regarding problematic issues of intercollegiate athletics warrants further research, Fulmer's story reveals how he learned to be a quality coach (i.e., positive, supportive, caring, following the rules).…”