2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2015.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective connectivity in the neural network underlying coarse-to-fine categorization of visual scenes. A dynamic causal modeling study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the overall importance of HSF for correctly categorizing facial expressions seems to be modulated by the type of emotion being processed: While the identification of sad expressions is mainly dependent on fine (HSF) facial components, happy expressions are more guided by coarse (LSF) facial information (Kumar & Srinivasan, 2011;Srinivasan & Gupta, 2011). Consistent with a coarse-to-fine account of visual perception in TD participants (Bar, 2003;Kauffmann, Chauvin, Pichat, & Peyrin, 2015), happy emotions are generally found to be identified faster than sad expressions (Hitenan & Leppanen, 2004;Srivastava & Srinivasan, 2010). Finally, these behavioral findings might not solely reflect the activation of cortical processing areas during face perception (Campatelli et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Furthermore, the overall importance of HSF for correctly categorizing facial expressions seems to be modulated by the type of emotion being processed: While the identification of sad expressions is mainly dependent on fine (HSF) facial components, happy expressions are more guided by coarse (LSF) facial information (Kumar & Srinivasan, 2011;Srinivasan & Gupta, 2011). Consistent with a coarse-to-fine account of visual perception in TD participants (Bar, 2003;Kauffmann, Chauvin, Pichat, & Peyrin, 2015), happy emotions are generally found to be identified faster than sad expressions (Hitenan & Leppanen, 2004;Srivastava & Srinivasan, 2010). Finally, these behavioral findings might not solely reflect the activation of cortical processing areas during face perception (Campatelli et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…It has been shown that the orbitofrontal cortex is strongly activated during LSF processing, corresponding to the initial visual information transmitted by the magnocellular visual pathway [26]. The orbitofrontal cortex is also known to play a critical role in facilitating the recognition of visual inputs by sending predictive feedback based on the rapid processing of LSF to sensory cortices [7,8,26]. In the literature, functional segregation is proposed between medial regions (encompassing the anterior cingulate cortex and subcallosal area) and lateral regions (encompassing the inferior frontal cortex and anterior insula).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, LSF (conveyed by fast magnocellular pathways) could rapidly activate higher-order cerebral areas (e.g., parietal and frontal cortices) and activate plausible semantic interpretations about the stimulus based on coarse information. The orbitofrontal cortex might be predominantly involved in the generation of predictions about the visual stimulus [6][7][8]. Predictions could then be projected to lower order cerebral areas (e.g., occipito-temporal cortex) via top-down connections to guide the subsequent processing of HSF (conveyed more slowly by parvocellular pathways).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As experimental evidence, a combined magnetoencephalography (MEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study (Bar et al, 2006) demonstrated earlier activations in the orbitofrontal cortex than in the occipito-temporal cortex during recognition of object images, this early activity depending on the presence of LSF in the image. Recent fMRI studies investigating the effective connectivity between these regions using dynamic causal modeling showed that a magnocellular signal (e.g., achromatic and low-luminance contrast drawings, LSF-filtered scenes) increases the connectivity strength from the orbitofrontal cortex to the inferotemporal cortex (Kauffmann, Chauvin, Pichat, & Peyrin, 2015;Kveraga et al, 2007). Petras, ten Oever, Jacobs, and Goffaux (2019) used a classifier trained to discriminate between EEG scalp patterns evoked by LSF inputs and EEG scalp patterns evoked by HSF inputs in order to tease apart LSF and HSF contribution to the neural response evoked by broadband stimuli.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%