Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter Of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Hu 2018
DOI: 10.18653/v1/n18-2099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective Crowdsourcing for a New Type of Summarization Task

Abstract: Most summarization research focuses on summarizing the entire given text, but in practice readers are often interested in only one aspect of the document or conversation. We propose "targeted summarization" as an umbrella category for summarization tasks that intentionally consider only parts of the input data. This covers query-based summarization, update summarization, and a new task we propose where the goal is to summarize a particular aspect of a document. However, collecting data for this new task is har… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional iterations of this procedure are likely to improve microaggression recognition and substantially increase the seize of the corpus. We note that one option is to have workers generate examples, rather than rate (e.g., Xu et al, 2013;Su et al, 2016;Jiang et al, 2018); however, such a process raises ethical concerns of having crowdworkers generate toxic statements towards others. Second, our current focus is on gender-based MAS.…”
Section: Discussion and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional iterations of this procedure are likely to improve microaggression recognition and substantially increase the seize of the corpus. We note that one option is to have workers generate examples, rather than rate (e.g., Xu et al, 2013;Su et al, 2016;Jiang et al, 2018); however, such a process raises ethical concerns of having crowdworkers generate toxic statements towards others. Second, our current focus is on gender-based MAS.…”
Section: Discussion and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers have used crowdsourcing platforms to create new language resources (Roit et al, 2020;Jiang et al, 2018). Some work created a parallel corpus for domain-adaptation by asking crowdworkers to translate in-domain monolingual sentences (Zaidan and Callison-Burch, 2011;Behnke et al, 2018;Kalimuthu et al, 2019).…”
Section: Creating Parallel Corpus With Crowdworkersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given numerous prior work noting that summaries written by crowd workers exhibit limitations associated with lack of annotator expertise in the domain (Gillick and Liu, 2010), especially at narrower tasks like query-based summarization (Jiang et al, 2018), we use LLM-generated references for benchmarking reference-based methods instead.…”
Section: Reference-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%