2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.12.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective Dose Reduction to Cardiac Structures Using Protons Compared With 3DCRT and IMRT in Mediastinal Hodgkin Lymphoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
74
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
74
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Involved field radiotherapy has been reported to give a median MHD of 17.2 Gy for prescribed doses of 35 Gy and involved node radiotherapy leads to even lower doses (median MHDs of 7.7-12.0 Gy for prescribed doses of 36 Gy). [33][34][35] Also, anthracycline doses are nowadays frequently lower than the doses received by the majority of patients in our study. Therefore, patients treated today are likely to be at a substantially lower risk of treatment-related HF than the patients included in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Involved field radiotherapy has been reported to give a median MHD of 17.2 Gy for prescribed doses of 35 Gy and involved node radiotherapy leads to even lower doses (median MHDs of 7.7-12.0 Gy for prescribed doses of 36 Gy). [33][34][35] Also, anthracycline doses are nowadays frequently lower than the doses received by the majority of patients in our study. Therefore, patients treated today are likely to be at a substantially lower risk of treatment-related HF than the patients included in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Proton therapy enhances the ability to deliver conformal radiation treatments while sparing surrounding normal tissues. For mediastinal lymphoma (ML), passive scattering proton therapy has been shown to deliver a conformal dose to the tumor while decreasing dose to normal tissues like lung, esophagus, heart, and coronary arteries [1][2][3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biological modeling using follow‐up information from patients receiving radiotherapy offers a method of interpreting the dose‐volume data of treatment plans to predict outcomes 13 , 14 . Dose planning studies have previously suggested that advanced radiotherapy techniques could reduce the dose to the organs at risk (OAR) considered in this work 15 , 16 , 17 . Brodin et al (18) review models for risks of specific radiation‐induced effects in patients with HL, focusing on linear models that rely on mean dose for calculation of risk for cancer induction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%