Effective drag on spheres immersed in a fluidized bed at minimum fluidization—Influence of bulk solids properties

Abstract

The aims of this work are to elucidate the effects that bulk solids properties have on the effective drag experienced by large spheres immersed in an emulsion of group-B solids under minimum fluidization conditions and to analyze the ways in which the different suspensions react towards different applied shear rates. To investigate this, magnetic particle tracking was applied to resolve the trajectory of falling-sphere measurements in which the size, density, and sphericity of the bulk solids were varied as well as the size and density of the spherical tracers. The resulting experimental scope included both rising and sinking tracers as well as full segregation and in-bed stagnation of the tracers. The set-up provided highly resolved tracer trajectories, from which the drag experienced by the sphere can be calculated. For sinking tracers, the results showed that an increase in bulk solids size, angularity, and density reduced the terminal velocity of the sphere. This effect correlated well with the bed expansion and Hausner ratio, indicating that a reduced void space among the bulk solids is the main reason for the increase in motion resistance. At lower shear rates, namely, during the de-acceleration towards the stagnant state, beds of larger, more angular, or denser bulk solids yield lower levels of shear stress. The angle of repose of the bulk solids correlated with the rate at which the emulsion thins with increasing shear rate. For rising tracers, shear stress did not show any significant dependency on the properties of the bulk solids.

Preface to the special issue section in memory of John R. Grace

“…This special issue includes 18 papers spanning John's main interests in clean energy, [4][5][6][7][8] fluidization and fluidparticle systems, [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] and chemical engineering perspectives [19][20][21] but cannot fully capture his significance. Listing someone's professional work rarely reveals why they leave a unique hole or why those who had the good fortune to regard them as a colleague feel a strong sense of loss.…”