2009 Ninth International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications 2009
DOI: 10.1109/isda.2009.105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective Feature Selection for Mars McMurdo Terrain Image Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper presents an integrated approach for performing large-scale Mars terrain image classification, by exploiting the recent advances in fuzzy-rough feature selection techniques [15]. It is based on the initial work presented in [28,29], where fuzzy-rough methods were, for the first time, applied to tasks relevant to space engineering. In this work, only those informative features are required to be generated in order to perform classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper presents an integrated approach for performing large-scale Mars terrain image classification, by exploiting the recent advances in fuzzy-rough feature selection techniques [15]. It is based on the initial work presented in [28,29], where fuzzy-rough methods were, for the first time, applied to tasks relevant to space engineering. In this work, only those informative features are required to be generated in order to perform classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the difficulty of data acquisition for Mars terrain images, many studies tested terrain classification methods with roves’ fully operational duplicates in Earth conditions and then applied those methods to the actual rover. The image features that are often used for terrain classification in those studies include color features based on the RGB space [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ], HSV [ 6 , 7 , 13 , 14 , 15 ], and Lab [ 16 ] spaces; Gabor features [ 12 , 17 , 18 ]; the contrast [ 10 , 11 , 12 ], correlation [ 12 ], energy [ 11 , 12 , 13 ], and consistency [ 12 ] of gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM); SURF features [ 19 , 20 ]; Daisy features [ 19 , 20 ]; local binary patterns (LBP) [ 19 , 20 , 21 ]; local ternary patterns (LTP) [ 19 , 20 , 21 ]; local adaptive ternary patterns (LATP) [ 19 , 20 ]; contrast context histogram (CCH) [ 20 ]; and the mean [ 2 , 9 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 22 ], entropy [ 8 , 9 , 22 ], contrast [ 8 , 23 ], correlation [ 23 ], energy [ 8 ,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It will reduce the classification accuracy for terrain classification. In these studies, the classifiers used include random forests (RFs) [ 2 , 12 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ], SVMs [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 16 , 17 , 19 , 20 ], multilayer perceptron [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 19 , 20 ], LIBLINEAR [ 19 , 20 ], decision tree [ 19 , 20 ], naïve Bayes classifier [ 19 , 20 ], K-nearest neighbor (KNN) [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 17 , 19 , 20 ], extreme learning machine [ 17 , 24 ], batch-incremental regression tree model [ 22 ], probabilistic neural network [ 23 ], and multilayer feed forward neural network learning algorithm [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations