2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jma.2019.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective femtosecond laser shock peening on a Mg–3Gd alloy at low pulse energy 430 µJ of 1 kHz

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[44] These dominate the changes in the surface and in-depth residual stress during NLSP. As shown in Figure S5, Supporting Information, the compressive residual stresses induced by FLSC [46,47] are tuned to tensile states on the colorized surfaces after NLSP near peened surfaces. The limitation of the plasma generation induced by weak light coupling and the negative effect of tensile stress induced by thermal ablation [48,49] lead to shallow affected depths for light yellow samples.…”
Section: Peak Pressure Generation and Residual Stress Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[44] These dominate the changes in the surface and in-depth residual stress during NLSP. As shown in Figure S5, Supporting Information, the compressive residual stresses induced by FLSC [46,47] are tuned to tensile states on the colorized surfaces after NLSP near peened surfaces. The limitation of the plasma generation induced by weak light coupling and the negative effect of tensile stress induced by thermal ablation [48,49] lead to shallow affected depths for light yellow samples.…”
Section: Peak Pressure Generation and Residual Stress Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, femtosecond laser shock peening (FLSP) can be conducted directly under air conditions, which provides different engineering potentials [22][23][24]. In FLSP processing, milli-Joule-scale energy input (even micro-Joule-scale energy input [25,26]) is adopted, which is three orders of magnitude lower than that used in NLSP [20,22,23]. Due to the ultra-short duration characteristics, FLSP induces high shock wave pressure of several hundred GPa in the air with milli-Joule-scale energy [25,26], whereas 1-10 GPa pressure can be induced in NLSP with Joule-scale energy [13,14,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In FLSP processing, milli-Joule-scale energy input (even micro-Joule-scale energy input [25,26]) is adopted, which is three orders of magnitude lower than that used in NLSP [20,22,23]. Due to the ultra-short duration characteristics, FLSP induces high shock wave pressure of several hundred GPa in the air with milli-Joule-scale energy [25,26], whereas 1-10 GPa pressure can be induced in NLSP with Joule-scale energy [13,14,20]. The introduction of water layers weakens the peening effects as strong ionization of confining medium shields the majority absorption of incident laser energy [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared with ns-LSP, fs-LSP is found to introduce higher surface hardness at lower energy input 36 and interact differently with the confinement medium and protective coating than ns-laser. 35 For instance, Lu et al 37 found that the surface hardness of Mg−3Gd alloy is improved by 70% through fs-LSP with 430 μJ pulse energy, as compared to 45.1% using ns-LSP with 9 J pulse energy due to less thermally facilitated subsurface structure relaxation. Apart from the effective strength improvement, fs-LSP is also beneficial to corrosion resistance enhancement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%