2018
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/aae4a9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective many-body Hamiltonians of qubit-photon bound states

Abstract: Quantum emitters (QEs) coupled to structured baths can localize multiple photons around them and form qubit-photon bound states. In the Markovian or weak coupling regime, the interaction of QEs through these single-photon bound states is known to lead to effective many-body QE Hamiltonians with tuneable but yet perturbative interactions. In this work we study the emergence of such models in the non-Markovian or strong coupling regime in different excitation subspaces. The effective models for the non-Markovian… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4(b) and 4(c), we plot the energy dispersion and associated density of states D(ω) for models with power-law exponents ν = 3/2, 2, 3, and 4. As expected for large exponents, both the energy dispersion and density of states tend to converge to the nearest-neighbor case of ω(k) ≈ −2t cos(k), with two van Hove singularities at the band edges (see, e.g., [53,54,56]). When the exponent decreases, however, the longer-range hoppings strongly modify the band structure and associated density states.…”
Section: B Long-range Hopping Modelssupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4(b) and 4(c), we plot the energy dispersion and associated density of states D(ω) for models with power-law exponents ν = 3/2, 2, 3, and 4. As expected for large exponents, both the energy dispersion and density of states tend to converge to the nearest-neighbor case of ω(k) ≈ −2t cos(k), with two van Hove singularities at the band edges (see, e.g., [53,54,56]). When the exponent decreases, however, the longer-range hoppings strongly modify the band structure and associated density states.…”
Section: B Long-range Hopping Modelssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Like in other structured baths [57], such nonanalytical behavior of the density of states will result in non-Markovian quantum dynamics when the emitter's frequencies are tuned with the nonanalytical regions. In this manuscript, however, we will focus only on characterizing the effective emitter's interactions J i j in the regime where one can still adiabatically eliminate the photonic bath (Born-Markov regime) by assuming lies far enough from the band edges [53,54,56]. Since this bath can be written as a simple Bravais lattice, the expression of Eq.…”
Section: B Long-range Hopping Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dissipative because the information is lost in the traveling wave packets. On the other hand, dressed atom-field eigenstates localized around the quantum emitter, called bound states [40][41][42][43][44], generate nondissipative but exponentially bounded interactions [10,12,[45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…QEs outside of the band: Tunable complex interactions.-We focus now on the regime where ∆ / ∈ ω l/u (k), such that the physics is dominated by the bound states (BSs) [61,[63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76]. In the single-excitation subspace, the BS wavefunction of a single emitter coupled to the D sublattice reads: where m = −1, 0, 1 denotes the different BSs that can appear in the upper/middle/lower band-gap, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the physical phase of the photonic lattice φ is inherited by the effective spin-spin interactions (see SM [45]). We finally want to note that even richer many-body dynamics will appear in the non-perturbative regime replacing spins by polaritons [81].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%