2014
DOI: 10.1017/s0960129513000352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective metric model theory

Abstract: This paper is a further investigation of a project carried out in Didehvar and Ghasemloo (2009) to study effective aspects of the metric logic. We prove an effective version of the omitting types theorem. We also present some concrete computable constructions showing that both the separable atomless probability algebra and the rational Urysohn space are computable metric structures.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the following, the concepts of computable and decidable metric structures are explained. This approach to study the effectiveness of the metric structures is firstly introduced in [12].…”
Section: Effective Metric Model Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the following, the concepts of computable and decidable metric structures are explained. This approach to study the effectiveness of the metric structures is firstly introduced in [12].…”
Section: Effective Metric Model Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It means p ∈ Σ ω is a name for a continuous function η p :⊆ Σ ω → Σ ω with a G δ -domain which on input q returns the value η p (q). For more details of this representation, see [6] and [12].…”
Section: Effective Metric Model Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the 2010s, three projects were undertaken on effectivity with respect to continuous logic and metric structures. Didehvar and Pourmahdian completed joint work with Ghasemloo (13) and Tavana (28), and Moody wrote a Ph.D. thesis (26). The first two of these implicitly used computable presentations, while the last did so somewhat explicitly.…”
Section: For the Mathematicianmentioning
confidence: 99%