2015 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/ultsym.2015.0055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective nonlinear constants for SAW devices from FEM calculations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…14. This confirms previous reasoning that the H2 contribution is significant in the case of low dispersion [8].…”
Section: Direct and Cascaded Nonlinearitiessupporting
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…14. This confirms previous reasoning that the H2 contribution is significant in the case of low dispersion [8].…”
Section: Direct and Cascaded Nonlinearitiessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…From the overall results of our comparison of the periodic P-matrix simulations with FEM simulations (Fig. 8), using the scaling factors listed in Table II for different η, we are led to the conclusion that the metal electrodes play a dominant role that confirms the results presented earlier [8]. As expected, nonlinear FEM shows that the IMD3 power, calculated with geometric nonlinearity only, is much lower than the total IMD3.…”
Section: B Geometric and Materials Nonlinearitiessupporting
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations