2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.spmi.2016.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective passivant pseudopotentials for semiconductors: Beyond the spherical approximation

Abstract: An effective atomic pseudopotential for passivation of semiconductor surfaces is presented. It is shown that the spherical approximation used in the effective and empirical pseudopotential methods is not suitable for describing passivants and that, instead, they have to be regarded as complex quantities. Since the new pseudopotentials cannot be handled as usual bulk ones, the way of implementing them in atomistic methods is described here, together with a methodology for extracting them trough an analytic conn… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One possible way is to use fractionally charged elements [51] with proper atomic sizes, for instance, 1.5e charged lithium used for passivating two nitrogen dangling bonds, or 6.5e charged fluorine used for two gallium dangling bonds. Therefore, proper generated passivant pseudopotentials are necessary [52], while it is out of scope of this paper. If all the PCPs are exact, the residue energy should be zero.…”
Section: / 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One possible way is to use fractionally charged elements [51] with proper atomic sizes, for instance, 1.5e charged lithium used for passivating two nitrogen dangling bonds, or 6.5e charged fluorine used for two gallium dangling bonds. Therefore, proper generated passivant pseudopotentials are necessary [52], while it is out of scope of this paper. If all the PCPs are exact, the residue energy should be zero.…”
Section: / 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible way is to use fractionally charged elements [51] with proper atomic sizes, for instance, 1.5e charged lithium used for passivating two nitrogen dangling bonds, or 6.5e charged fluorine used for two gallium dangling bonds. Therefore, proper generated passivant pseudopotentials are necessary [52], while it is out of scope of this paper. Additionally, for the self-consistency (or accuracy) estimation, if both the top and bottom surfaces are cut into zigzag structures, and all the dangling bonds are passivated by pseudo-H atoms, we shall define a residue energy as:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%