Effective police investigative practices: an evidence-assessment of the research

Abstract

PurposeDetective work is a mainstay of modern law enforcement, but its effectiveness has been much less evaluated than patrol work. To explore what is known about effective investigative practices and to identify evidence gaps, the authors assess the current state of empirical research on investigations.Design/methodology/approachThe authors assess the empirical research about the effectiveness of criminal investigations and detective work in resolving cases and improving clearance rates.FindingsThe authors’ analysis of the literature produced 80 studies that focus on seven categories of investigations research, which include the impact that case and situational factors, demographic and neighborhood dynamics, organizational policies and practices, investigative effort, technology, patrol officers and community members have on case resolution. The authors’ assessment shows that evaluation research examining the effectiveness of various investigative activities is rare. However, the broader empirical literature indicates that a combination of organizational policies, investigative effort and certain technologies can be promising in improving investigative outcomes even in cases deemed less solvable.Research limitations/implicationsFrom an evidence-based perspective, this review emphasizes the need for greater transparency, evaluation and accountability of investigative activities given the resources and importance afforded to criminal investigations.Originality/valueThis review is currently the most up-to-date review of the state of the research on what is known about effective investigative practices.

Beyond impunity: An evaluation of New York State's nonfatal shooting initiative

“…Empirical inquiry into the effectiveness of criminal investigations has grown considerably in the last 20 years, but much of it has concentrated on the investigation of homicide, to the exclusion of other types of offenses, and a large fraction of the accumulated evidence dwells on the effects of case characteristics and not on the conduct and organization of investigations (Prince et al., 2021). In particular, “there is a dearth of outcome evaluations that more rigorously examine the impact that specific investigative activities, organizational changes, community‐based programs, or technologies have on investigative outcomes” (Prince et al., 2021). Evaluations of initiatives like those of Hartford, Kansas City, and Denver would be valuable additions to the existing body of evidence.…”

Differences Between High and Low Performing Police Agencies in Clearing Robberies, Aggravated Assaults, and Burglaries: Findings From an Eight-Agency Case Study

“…These results provide police practice and research with the knowledge to tackle investigative reforms. At the most practical level, our study and others reviewed by Prince et al (2021) point to several tendencies of higher-performing investigative units and processes that agencies can mimic. These tendencies are not based on informal consensus or beliefs about what constitutes "good investigations" but on systematic study and observation.…”

Explaining the Extraordinary Decline in Chicago’s Homicide Arrest Rates, 1965 to 1994 and Beyond: Trends in Case Mix Versus Standards for Arrest

“…In this analysis, we seek to adjust the trend in arrest rates for intertemporal changes in the case mix. The literature on solvability in homicide cases identifies particular characteristics of a homicide case that are associated with or affect the ease of solution (Alderden & Lavery, 2007; Avdija et al, 2022; Jarvis et al, 2017; Prince et al, 2021; Wellford & Cronin, 2000; Wellford et al, 2019). These characteristics help answer the “who, where, and how” questions, and include weapon type, location, and demographic characteristics of the victim—all of which are almost always recorded regardless of the success of the investigation.…”