Viable Populations for Conservation 1987
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511623400.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective population size, genetic variation, and their use in population management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
651
3
8

Year Published

1990
1990
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 866 publications
(670 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
8
651
3
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Probable adaptive genetic differentiation was greater between small and large populations or among small populations than among large populations, based on signatures of balancing and/or diversifying selection at SNPs linked to phenotypic traits. These patterns were stronger for estimates of N b than N, an important finding given that theoretically it is through N b that selection should influence the magnitude of adaptive genetic differentiation [20,35]. What we did not find was evidence of reduced signatures of selection in small populations relative to large populations, despite that overall genetic variation (multi-locus heterozygosity) and neutral differentiation ( pairwise neutral F ST ) were consistent with pronounced genetic drift in small populations.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Probable adaptive genetic differentiation was greater between small and large populations or among small populations than among large populations, based on signatures of balancing and/or diversifying selection at SNPs linked to phenotypic traits. These patterns were stronger for estimates of N b than N, an important finding given that theoretically it is through N b that selection should influence the magnitude of adaptive genetic differentiation [20,35]. What we did not find was evidence of reduced signatures of selection in small populations relative to large populations, despite that overall genetic variation (multi-locus heterozygosity) and neutral differentiation ( pairwise neutral F ST ) were consistent with pronounced genetic drift in small populations.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…[19]). It is also the genetic parameter N b -not the ecological parameter N-that selection is associated with and that influences the magnitude of adaptive genetic variation and differentiation [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous models [3,34], where the rate of evolution is determined by additive genetic variation instead of mutational input, the relationship between population size and the rate of evolution can be weaker (reviewed in [65]). Although non-additive genetic effects, such as epistasis and dominance, and temporal fluctuations in abundance (leading to lower effective population sizes) can weaken the relationship between population size and the rate of evolution [66], they do not qualitatively alter our results, but merely lead to a slower rate of evolution than predicted.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…For instance, rainy days at the beginning of the light period in 1983 were found to inluence individual development in Euphydryas editha bayensis, resulting in the irst females emerging 14 days after males, which had a clear negative efect on the population dynamics of the species (Dobkin et al 1987;Baughman 1991). Furthermore, a high level of temporal fragmentation, namely short individual life span in relation to long light period, in combination with protandry seriously reduced the efective population size (sensu Lande and Barrowclough 1987;Hill 1972), thus accelerating the loss of genetic variability in small populations. In contrast to several earlier studies, which suggested that extinction risk in butterlies decreases with lengthening light period (Komonen et al 2004;Kotiaho et al 2005;Franzen and;Johannesson 2007), our analyses did not reveal any link between light period length alone and species conservation status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%