2020
DOI: 10.1080/00908320.2020.1737444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective Protection of the Marine Environment and Equitable Benefit Sharing in the Area: Empty Promises or Feasible Goals?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the international legal framework governing seabed mining activities in the Area, which -despite its remote location -is part of the sacred ocean and may affectgui numerous marine species of cultural significance that migrate between coastal areas and high seas, contains very few provisions related to traditional knowledge and interests. Although the overarching status of the deep seabed and its mineral resources as the Common Heritage of Mankind (CHM) (article 136) reflects the idea of collective ownership and preservation for future generations, the associated measures and mechanisms have yet to be adequately implemented by the ISA (Willaert, 2020b) and no explicit references to traditional dimensions have been integrated in the Mining Code (Jaeckel et al, 2017;Bourrel et al, 2018). Moreover, overall improvements to the international regime for the deep seabed in terms of transparency and public participationwhich might serve as powerful catalysts to promote the integration and consideration of traditional knowledgein the relevant legal frameworks and decision-makingare certainly desirable (Willaert, 2020c).…”
Section: Integration Of Traditional Dimensions Into Regulatory Framew...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the international legal framework governing seabed mining activities in the Area, which -despite its remote location -is part of the sacred ocean and may affectgui numerous marine species of cultural significance that migrate between coastal areas and high seas, contains very few provisions related to traditional knowledge and interests. Although the overarching status of the deep seabed and its mineral resources as the Common Heritage of Mankind (CHM) (article 136) reflects the idea of collective ownership and preservation for future generations, the associated measures and mechanisms have yet to be adequately implemented by the ISA (Willaert, 2020b) and no explicit references to traditional dimensions have been integrated in the Mining Code (Jaeckel et al, 2017;Bourrel et al, 2018). Moreover, overall improvements to the international regime for the deep seabed in terms of transparency and public participationwhich might serve as powerful catalysts to promote the integration and consideration of traditional knowledgein the relevant legal frameworks and decision-makingare certainly desirable (Willaert, 2020c).…”
Section: Integration Of Traditional Dimensions Into Regulatory Framew...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without seemingly affecting the principles (arising from the CHM), the 1994 Implementation Agreement significantly reformed several underlying rules and mechanisms, further complicating the operationalization of the ideals embedded in Part XI of UNCLOS (Beurier, 2021). A lot of work remains to effectively implement the CHM concept in the run-up to the DSM exploitation phase (Willaert, 2020a) and there is still ample room for improvement with regard to transparency and public participation (Willaert, 2020b). Moreover, direct references to traditional knowledge and visions have not yet been integrated in the provisions of the "Mining Code, " this being the comprehensive set of rules and procedures issued by the ISA to regulate activities in the Area.…”
Section: International Legal Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous literature on Indonesia's DSM absence has been limited to its legal framework (Puspitawati, 2018) and lack of regional seabed regime (Nugroho and Putranti, 2018), when in fact the study of Indonesian DSM could have been explored through other fields of study. For instance, literature focusing on other countries has examined DSM practices via geopolitics (Childs, 2020), political economy (Childs, 2019;Filer and Gabriel, 2018), and state's preparedness (Willaert, 2020). As suggested by Carver et al (2020), there is a need to further scrutinise the practice of DSM from a multi-disciplinary perspective by using additional approaches, particularly social science.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%