2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10509-013-1597-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective recombination coefficient and solar zenith angle effects on low-latitude D-region ionosphere evaluated from VLF signal amplitude and its time delay during X-ray solar flares

Abstract: delay is anti-correlated with the flare peak energy flux φ max independent of these time slots, the goodness of fit, as measured by reduced-χ 2 , actually worsens as the day progresses. The variation of the Z dependence of reduced-χ 2 seems to follow the variation of standard deviation of Z along the T x -R x propagation path. In other words, for the flares having almost constant Z over the path a tighter anti-correlation between △t and φ max was observed.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
39
2
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
9
39
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In fig. 4 we show the relevant data for 74.1 km and 74 km obtained by fitting of dependencies α eff in the maximum X-radiation flux presented in [6,27] (fill and open scatters, respectively). In addition, in these studies we give calculated values for events of class very similar to the X-ray flare which we analyze.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fig. 4 we show the relevant data for 74.1 km and 74 km obtained by fitting of dependencies α eff in the maximum X-radiation flux presented in [6,27] (fill and open scatters, respectively). In addition, in these studies we give calculated values for events of class very similar to the X-ray flare which we analyze.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our results we observe that peak of the electron density and the peak of the ionization rate occur at different times. As discussed in numerous papers (Zigman et al, 2007;Basak et al, 2013;Palit et al, 2014), the electron density peak and hence VLF modulation peak during any such ionization event should appear after a delay from that of the event peak or the ionization peak. This is due to the sluggishness of the lower ionosphere.…”
Section: Observation and Analysismentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This is one of the major assumptions for the numerical modelling as used by various scientist such as Hayakawa et al (1996), , Clilverd et al (1999), Rodger et al (1999). Also in numerical modelling, this assumption was used in a vast scale by Budden (1961), Baba et al (1998), Wait and Spices (1964), Pal et al (2012), Basak and Chakrabarti (2013), Palit et al (2013). It is obvious that the decrease in the reflection height modified the total path length of the radio wave and this changes the phase of the VLF signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%