2011
DOI: 10.1109/tcad.2011.2120950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective Robustness Analysis Using Bounded Model Checking Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Identification of architectural Validation of error-detection Correctness of locked logic; Proof-carrying validation covert channels [31] properties [32] De-obfuscation attacks [33] hardware […”
Section: Functionalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identification of architectural Validation of error-detection Correctness of locked logic; Proof-carrying validation covert channels [31] properties [32] De-obfuscation attacks [33] hardware […”
Section: Functionalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a complete proof then requires exhaustive simulation of all faults and all input patterns. To avoid this, more recent approaches apply BDD-based or SAT-based analysis as well as SAT-based ATPG [15,[21][22][23]. Subsection 4.1 explains how fault secureness and self-testability can be checked with SAT-based ATPG while Subsection 4.2 focuses on strong fault secureness.…”
Section: Analyzing Fault Tolerancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, standard synthesis procedures are not tailored to the specific requirements of self-checking logic. On the one hand, they may violate design constraints, such that fault tolerance properties must be verified after synthesis [15,22,23]. On the other hand, they are not able to take advantage of the specific optimization potential for code generators, prediction logic and checkers [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another application area of verification tools is the analysis of transient faults [4]- [6]. For analyzing transient faults, it is important to know for how many time cycles the fault may affect the output of the circuit at the maximum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%