2018
DOI: 10.1214/18-ejs1460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective sample size for spatial regression models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…How to optimise the power of the test in specific settings should be pursued. Next, eliminating the need for generating Monte Carlo samples from the null point process may be possible [Acosta et al, 2018]. We found that 'effective-sample size'-adjusted rank correlation tests showed very poor performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…How to optimise the power of the test in specific settings should be pursued. Next, eliminating the need for generating Monte Carlo samples from the null point process may be possible [Acosta et al, 2018]. We found that 'effective-sample size'-adjusted rank correlation tests showed very poor performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It seems reasonable to assume that the variance of 𝑝𝐻 is proportional to the sum of the variances of the parameters. Acosta and Vallejos (2018) showed that the information from 𝑁 correlated samples is equivalent to the information matrix for 𝑛 * independent samples. Thus, increasing the number of grids in a spatial field has greatly diminishing returns as the correlation between contiguous grids grows.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An analytical solution of 𝐶 −1 𝜂 is impractical for the exponential covariance function used here. But if we consider an increasing function of cost for the number of grids and the exponential correlation function, we know that the 𝑁𝑡𝑟(𝑀 𝑡 𝐶 −1 𝜂 𝑀) is a decreasing function of the range 𝑎 𝐵𝑝ℎ (Acosta & Vallejos, 2018). Greater spatial autocorrelation means that lesser information is gained by adding more (sample size) and so we can conclude that as 𝑎 𝐵𝑝ℎ gets bigger and bigger, the optimal number of grids will be smaller.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors argue that small area estimation methods, "borrow strength" from adjacent regions and therefore compensate for the small sample sizes which is often observed in these areas. In turn, Acosta and Valejos ( 2018 ) provide a simulation of information loss depending on the n in spatial regression. They show that including 25 units provides the evidence for spatial correlation only slightly weaker than including 50 units.…”
Section: Public Data Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%