1992
DOI: 10.1016/0004-3702(92)90106-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective solution of qualitative interval constraint problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This considerably reduces the branching factor of the search tree. Instead of splitting each relation into all of its base relations, they can be split into sub-relations contained in T [126]. The average branching factor of the resulting search tree depends on how well T splits the relations of 2 � .…”
Section: Qualitative Spatial Representation and Reasoningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This considerably reduces the branching factor of the search tree. Instead of splitting each relation into all of its base relations, they can be split into sub-relations contained in T [126]. The average branching factor of the resulting search tree depends on how well T splits the relations of 2 � .…”
Section: Qualitative Spatial Representation and Reasoningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis has revealed [28] that whereas the path consistency determined by constraint propagation is O(n3), full consistency is an NP-hard problem. Other studies suggest that clever implementation and good heuristics can provide solutions to full consistency with close to O(n 3) performance in the vast majority of cases [16,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of the need for carrying out constraint propagation efficiently, several investigators have suggested improvements on the basic algorithm ( [1,9,16,15], among others). The most fundamental efficiency is achieved by storing the compositions of the atomic relations in a look-up table, making the processing of each pair of relations a sequence of lookups and logical (disjunction and conjunction) or set (union and intersection) operations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This direct encoding scheme for IA networks can be derived from our 1-D support encoding scheme by replacing the SUP clauses with conflict (CON) clauses. If we represent SUP clauses between a triple of intervals (i < k < j) as a 3D array of allowable values for the CSP variable X ij given the values of X ik and X kj , then the corresponding CON clauses are defined as: (10) where…”
Section: The Sat Direct Encodingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing reasoning techniques are generally based on the backtracking approach (proposed by Ladkin and Reinefeld [10]), which uses path consistency as forward checking. Although this approach has been further improved [13,20], it and its variants still rely on path consistency checking at each step to prune the search space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%