“…For individual employees, MTM number has been reported to relate negatively (van de Brake et al., 2018 considering short‐term impact; Zika‐Viktorsson et al., 2006), positively (Li et al., 2020; van de Brake et al., 2020b; van de Brake et al., 2018 considering long‐term impact), curvilinearly (Chan, 2014; Colicev et al., 2023), and not (Rapp & Mathieu, 2019; van de Brake et al., 2020a) to effectiveness. Similarly, team‐level studies report a mix of positive (MTM number: Chan, 2014; Cummings & Haas, 2012; percentage of time: Cummings & Haas, 2012), negative (MTM number: Choi et al., 2021), curvilinear (MTM number: Bertolotti et al., 2015), and no relationships (MTM number: Carton & Cummings, 2013; Mortensen, 2014; van de Brake & Berger, 2023; percentage of time: Maynard et al., 2012; Mortensen, 2014; van de Brake & Berger, 2023). Finally, the few studies on MTM's effect on firm effectiveness show either a negative (Crawford et al., 2019) or curvilinear (Berger et al., 2022) relationship.…”