2022
DOI: 10.1097/psy.0000000000001074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Parameters for the Modulation of Eating Behavior: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract: ObjectiveThis study aimed to consider the effect of differing transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) parameters on eating-related measures and how issues with experimental design (e.g., inadequate blinding) or parameters variation may drive equivocal effects.MethodsLiterature searches were conducted across MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Science Direct. Studies using conventional sham-controlled tDCS to modify eating-related measures in adult human participants were included. A total of 1135 articles we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
(242 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We acknowledge that our meta-analysis considers the effects of heterogeneous tDCS parameters on eating behaviors. This may account for some variation in effect sizes, and it is important that the above recommendations are met with the use of effective stimulation parameters and appropriate study design (see Beaumont et al 116 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We acknowledge that our meta-analysis considers the effects of heterogeneous tDCS parameters on eating behaviors. This may account for some variation in effect sizes, and it is important that the above recommendations are met with the use of effective stimulation parameters and appropriate study design (see Beaumont et al 116 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the aim of improving consistency and identifying a meaningful effect of tDCS, we suggest that future work adhere with the following recommendations: Focus on recruiting participants who are susceptible to hedonic‐driven appetite (e.g., those experiencing frequent food craving or presenting with binge‐type behavior). Recruit participants who have trait susceptibilities for the specific outcome measure of interest (e.g., recruit those with binge eating symptomatology when looking to modulate food reward). To elucidate the potential link between enhanced executive functioning and improved appetite control following tDCS, studies should establish participants' baseline executive functioning capabilities and monitor any changes following stimulation. Limit the information provided to participants during recruitment and screening procedures, as this can drive any effects on eating behavior outcomes. Incorporate a comprehensive group of validated measures, including explicit liking and explicit and implicit wanting. Control fasting duration and measure baseline subjective appetite, even where subjective appetite is not a measure of interest. We acknowledge that our meta‐analysis considers the effects of heterogeneous tDCS parameters on eating behaviors. This may account for some variation in effect sizes, and it is important that the above recommendations are met with the use of effective stimulation parameters and appropriate study design (see Beaumont et al 116 ). Our understanding of population‐based differences in tDCS effects is still limited, and we need more studies to confirm our hypothesis that those with deficits in the control of eating behavior will be responsive to the effects of tDCS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%