Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3269206.3271796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective User Interaction for High-Recall Retrieval

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Looking across all fine-tuning configurations, we see that the top-scoring sentence of each candi-date document alone seems to be a good indicator of document relevance, corroborating the findings of Zhang et al (2018a). Additionally considering the second ranking sentence yields at most a minor gain, and in some cases, adding a third actually causes effectiveness to drop.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Looking across all fine-tuning configurations, we see that the top-scoring sentence of each candi-date document alone seems to be a good indicator of document relevance, corroborating the findings of Zhang et al (2018a). Additionally considering the second ranking sentence yields at most a minor gain, and in some cases, adding a third actually causes effectiveness to drop.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…In a recent study from Zhang et al (2018), they conducted a controlled 50users study to evaluate using document excerpts (a single extracted paragraph from document) as relevance feedback in continuous active learning. Participants were asked to find as many relevant documents as possible within one hour using the HiCAL system (Abualsaud et al, 2018b;Zhang et al, 2017;Abualsaud et al, 2018a).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al [2018c] used a simulation framework to evaluate sentence-level relevance feedback. Zhang et al [2018a] conducted a controlled user study with 50 users to evaluate a retrieval system using the full document or selected paragraph as relevance feedback in CAL. McDonald et al [2018] presented an evaluation of active learning strategies for sensitivity reviews.…”
Section: Technology-assisted Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%