2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective ventilation and air disinfection system for reducing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection risk in office buildings

Abstract: During the COVID-19 pandemic, an increasing amount of evidence has suggested that the virus can be transmitted through the air inside buildings. The ventilation system used to create the indoor environment would facilitate the transmission of the airborne infectious diseases. However, the existing ventilation systems in most buildings cannot supply sufficient clean outdoor air for diluting the virus concentration. To reduce the airborne infection risk and minimize energy consumption, especially in existing bui… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that a comprehensive comparison with other works in literature is not possible due to the high differences occurring among the investigated case studies. Nevertheless, the achieved outcomes are consistent with the results presented by other works on the same topic: by augmenting the outdoor airflow rate, Covid-19 contagion risk reduction up to 56% for a university facility [ 29 ], 30% for an office space [ 30 ], and 75% for an outpatient building [ 32 ] are obtained by other authors. It is worth noticing the occurring differences are mainly due to the very different case study geometry, indeed use, ventilation rates, etc.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that a comprehensive comparison with other works in literature is not possible due to the high differences occurring among the investigated case studies. Nevertheless, the achieved outcomes are consistent with the results presented by other works on the same topic: by augmenting the outdoor airflow rate, Covid-19 contagion risk reduction up to 56% for a university facility [ 29 ], 30% for an office space [ 30 ], and 75% for an outpatient building [ 32 ] are obtained by other authors. It is worth noticing the occurring differences are mainly due to the very different case study geometry, indeed use, ventilation rates, etc.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The same outcome is obtained in the work reported in Ref. [ 30 ], where the authors propose the adoption of ultraviolet-C (UV–C) and air disinfection device (RM3) to reduce the Covid-19 contagion risk. The authors conclude that the best strategy is the combination of disinfection devices and the use of 100% outside air, leading to a Covid-19 infection risk probability reduction from 27 to 3%.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…One prominent application of UV light sterilization of airflow is in protecting healthcare workers during manual or mechanical ventilation [17,18], and the apparatus evaluated in these experiments was a prototype for such a system. However, the same technology can readily be scaled to accommodate much larger conduits, such as ventilation ducts [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The World Health Organization recommends to increase the supply of fresh indoor air as an effective way to reduce the concentration of virus particles in enclosed spaces, thereby reducing the risk of infection. Therefore, effective building ventilation is essential to ensure the health and safety of occupants ( Cao et al, 2020a ; Kong et al, 2021 ; Srivastava et al, 2021 ;).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%