2021
DOI: 10.1007/s42600-021-00134-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness and quality analysis of methods in studies for the treatment of COVID-19

Abstract: Purpose COVID-19 has spread and continues to spread rapidly across the world. There is still no approved and effective treatment for the disease. Several drugs are being administered empirically to patients, based on results from studies with limited methodologies. There is an urgent need for systematic reviews to support decision makers and the development of guidelines. The purpose of this paper was to conduct a systematic review of drug studies carried out worldwide for COVID-19, verifying the effectiveness… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One article was not accessible and thus it was excluded. 19 After evaluating the other 92 articles for eligibility, 42 were excluded for the following reasons: one study investigated tocilizumab combined with another IL‐6 inhibitor, 20 two discussed therapies other than tocilizumab, 21 , 22 37 were not systematic reviews, 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 and two were systematic reviews of preclinical or animal studies. 60 , 61 Finally, 50 articles met the eligibility criteria and were included in the present umbrella review 6 , 28 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 ,…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One article was not accessible and thus it was excluded. 19 After evaluating the other 92 articles for eligibility, 42 were excluded for the following reasons: one study investigated tocilizumab combined with another IL‐6 inhibitor, 20 two discussed therapies other than tocilizumab, 21 , 22 37 were not systematic reviews, 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 and two were systematic reviews of preclinical or animal studies. 60 , 61 Finally, 50 articles met the eligibility criteria and were included in the present umbrella review 6 , 28 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 ,…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%