2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness and safety of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir in patients with chronic hepatitis C previously treated with DAAs

Abstract: Jordi Llaneras (1), Mar Riveiro-Barciela (1)(2), Sabela Lens (2)(3), Moisés Diago (4), Alba Cachero (5), Javier García-Samaniego (2)(6), Isabel Conde (7), Ana Arencibia (8), Juan Arenas (9), Francisco Gea (10), Xavier Torras (2)(11), José Luis Calleja (12), José Antonio Carrión (13), Inmaculada Fernández (14), Rosa María Morillas (2)(15), José Miguel Rosales (16), Isabel Carmona (17), Conrado Fernández-Rodríguez (18), Manuel Hernández-Guerra (19), Susana Llerena (20), Vanesa Bernal (21), Juan Turnes (22), Jesú… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
82
3
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
6
82
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The safety data of sofosbuvir, velpatasvir and voxilaprevir was based on data from phase II and III clinical trials and real-world studies. [35][36][37][38][39] Headache, diarrhoea and nausea were the most commonly reported adverse events. The incidence of gastrointestinal side effects was greater than with the combination of sofosbuvir and velpatasvir alone.…”
Section: Evidence Quality Notes Gradingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The safety data of sofosbuvir, velpatasvir and voxilaprevir was based on data from phase II and III clinical trials and real-world studies. [35][36][37][38][39] Headache, diarrhoea and nausea were the most commonly reported adverse events. The incidence of gastrointestinal side effects was greater than with the combination of sofosbuvir and velpatasvir alone.…”
Section: Evidence Quality Notes Gradingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Real world cohorts have confirmed SVR12 > 90% with this regimen, mainly for genotypes 1-4, following unsuccessful therapy with first generation NS5A inhibitors (65)(66)(67)(68) or unspecified NS5A inhibitors (69,70). However, a lower SVR12 (9/13, 69%) was reported for genotype 3 infected patients (subtypes not presented) with cirrhosis (71) . Regarding second generation NS5A inhibitor exposed individuals, lower SVR12 rates (83-86%) were reported in individuals with genotypes 1-3 previously exposed to sofosbuvir-velpatasvir, (72), but with no impact of this prior combination in other studies (SVR 94-100%) (73),(74) emphasising the need for further retreatment outcome datasets in sofosbuvir-velpatasvir exposed patients, including resistance data.…”
Section: Sofosbuvir-velpatasvir-voxilaprevirmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Thus, no general conclusions on risk factors for failure to SOF/VEL/VOX can be made. Two larger real-world cohorts from Italy and Spain reported a higher frequency of virologic treatment failure to SOF/VEL/VOX as rescue treatment for DAA failures in patients infected with HCV genotype 3a or liver cirrhosis [13,14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%