2022
DOI: 10.1007/s40121-022-00666-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness and Safety of Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir/Voxilaprevir as a Hepatitis C Virus Infection Salvage Therapy in the Real World: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Abstract: Introduction: Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir/Voxilaprevir (SOF/VEL/VOX) is the first direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy approved for patients who have previously failed a DAA-containing regimen including NS5A inhibitors. In clinical trials, SOF/VEL/VOX was associated with high rates of sustained virologic response at posttreatment week 12 (SVR12) and was well tolerated. However, the effectiveness and safety of SOF/VEL/VOX in the real world remained uncertain. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, all patients responded to SOF/VEL/VOX therapy, although data from a meta-analysis by Xie et al from a Canadian centre indicated that this option was less effective in patients previously treated with SOF/VEL [ 23 ]. The 12-week SOF/VEL/VOX therapy may be an effective option not only for patients with failed genotype-specific therapy, but also for those who failed to achieve SVR 12 on the pangenotypic GLE/PIB regimen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our study, all patients responded to SOF/VEL/VOX therapy, although data from a meta-analysis by Xie et al from a Canadian centre indicated that this option was less effective in patients previously treated with SOF/VEL [ 23 ]. The 12-week SOF/VEL/VOX therapy may be an effective option not only for patients with failed genotype-specific therapy, but also for those who failed to achieve SVR 12 on the pangenotypic GLE/PIB regimen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The most common adverse event, reported by 10% of patients, was fatigue. Headaches, nausea, diarrhoea, and itchiness were reported in less than 2% of cases, while in other studies these numbers reached 4–10% [ 23 ]. Anaemia was reported in three of our patients, and in all cases was related to the selection of the therapeutic option with RBV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…[10] However, the effectiveness of the triple-DAA regimen was challenged by the combination of SOF and VEL resistance, which is in agreement with studies reporting lower SOF/VEL/ VOX cure rates in SOF/VEL treatment-experienced patients. [5] Thus, the addition of at least 2 new DAAs (and not only VOX) might be necessary for the retreatment of SOF/VEL treatment-experienced patients. In contrast, for GLE/PIB treatment-experienced patients, this triple salvage therapy might be sufficient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current guidelines recommend the highly efficient pangenotypic regimens glecaprevir (GLE)/pibrentasvir (PIB) and SOF/velpatasvir (VEL) as first-line therapy, and the triple SOF/VEL/voxilaprevir (VOX) regimen as a re-treatment strategy 10 . However, higher treatment failure rates are still reported for genotype 3 compared with other genotypes for all pangenotypic regimens 3–5 . Moreover, recent studies have shown that certain nonepidemic HCV genotypes that harbor natural polymorphisms conferring inherent resistance to NS5A inhibitors, such as genotype 3b, 11 might also be less responsive to pangenotypic regimens 12 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation