2021
DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2021.1921808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness and Utility of Mobile Device Assessment of Subjective Craving during Residential Opioid Dependence Treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding comports with the previously highlighted link between craving instability and opioid substance use [ 21 ]. Nonetheless, we failed to observe any significant effects for the other measures of craving dynamics, namely, standard deviation – which indexes craving variability - or autocorrelation factor – which indexes craving inertia -, even though craving inertia has been linked to substance use in patients with an opioid use disorder [ 21 ] and craving variability to substance use in both opioid and tobacco use disorders [ 18 , 19 ]. It may be premature to conclude that the other indexes of craving dynamic are irrelevant, but the present findings suggest that taking variability and temporal dependency into account simultaneously using measures like MSSD allows a fine-grain, sensitive characterization of craving dynamic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding comports with the previously highlighted link between craving instability and opioid substance use [ 21 ]. Nonetheless, we failed to observe any significant effects for the other measures of craving dynamics, namely, standard deviation – which indexes craving variability - or autocorrelation factor – which indexes craving inertia -, even though craving inertia has been linked to substance use in patients with an opioid use disorder [ 21 ] and craving variability to substance use in both opioid and tobacco use disorders [ 18 , 19 ]. It may be premature to conclude that the other indexes of craving dynamic are irrelevant, but the present findings suggest that taking variability and temporal dependency into account simultaneously using measures like MSSD allows a fine-grain, sensitive characterization of craving dynamic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In SUD populations, a systematic review including 53 EMA studies examining the link between craving and subsequent substance use, 92 % showed that temporary craving increased the risk of substance use both concurrently and at the next sampling time [ 6 , 17 ]. Some studies using indexes of variability that did not take into account temporal stability such as SD or Mean Absolute Deviation were successful in demonstrating an impact of craving variability on substance use [ 18 , 19 ]. More recently, two studies investigated the dynamic of craving using MSSD, taking into account both variability and temporal stability: one comparing persons with or without psychotic disorders [ 20 ], and the other showing an impact on use beyond the mean level of craving in opioid use disorder [ 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several prior studies have reported daily rhythms (or time-of-day effects suggestive of a rhythm) in craving for various drugs of abuse, including nicotine, heroin, and other opioids (Cleveland et al, 2021;Ren et al, 2009;Teneggi et al, 2002Teneggi et al, , 2005. Furthermore, preclinical evidence has demonstrated a 24-h rhythm in alcohol consumption in alcohol-preferring mice, suggesting that both cravings and consumption of alcohol may follow a rhythm (Matson & Grahame, 2013).…”
Section: -H Rhythm In Alcohol Cravingmentioning
confidence: 99%