2023
DOI: 10.1007/s13755-023-00233-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness assessment of repetitive transcranial alternating current stimulation with concurrent EEG and fNIRS measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sparse design of the fNIRS array presents challenges in establishing short separation channels for measuring extracerebral signals. Additionally, future work on systematic manipulation is required to determine the best stimulation protocol (i.e., stimulation intensity and frequency) and to enhance brain excitation [17], [76], [77].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sparse design of the fNIRS array presents challenges in establishing short separation channels for measuring extracerebral signals. Additionally, future work on systematic manipulation is required to determine the best stimulation protocol (i.e., stimulation intensity and frequency) and to enhance brain excitation [17], [76], [77].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cognitive function is severely impaired when reaching severe PSCI, and the diagnostic criteria for dementia have been met. Patients may experience severe memory loss, language impairment, and behavioral abnormalities ( 11 14 ). Multiple studies have consistently demonstrated that individuals diagnosed with PSCI exhibit poorer rehabilitation outcomes related to physical function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The largest number of tACS studies (e.g., Jaušovec and Jaušovec, 2014 ; Jaušovec et al, 2014 ; Meiron and Lavidor, 2014 ; Vosskuhl et al, 2015 ; Alekseichuk et al, 2016 , 2017 ; Feurra et al, 2016 ; Santarnecchi et al, 2016 ; Kleinert et al, 2017 ; Borghini et al, 2018 ; Pahor and Jaušovec, 2018 ; Röhner et al, 2018 ; Tseng et al, 2018 ; Wolinski et al, 2018 ; Bender et al, 2019 ; Jones et al, 2019 ; Reinhart and Nguyen, 2019 ; Abellaneda-Pérez et al, 2020 ; Guo et al, 2021 ; Hosseinian et al, 2021 ; Sahu and Tseng, 2021 ; Biel et al, 2022 ; Draaisma et al, 2022 ; Hu et al, 2022 ; Soutschek et al, 2022 ; Zeng et al, 2022 ; Zhang et al, 2022 ; Grover et al, 2023 ; Rauh et al, 2023 ; Yang et al, 2023 ) targeted the theta band (4 Hz−7 Hz), which was proposed as the brain rhythm most strongly involved in encoding and maintaining the item sequences in WM (e.g., Lisman and Idiart, 1995 ; Jacob et al, 2018 ; Sauseng et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other studies yielded null or at best mixed results regarding the theta-frequency tACS for the n-back (Pahor and Jaušovec, 2018 ; Röhner et al, 2018 ; Jones et al, 2019 ; Soutschek et al, 2022 ; Zeng et al, 2022 ; Yang et al, 2023 ) and change-detection task (Santarnecchi et al, 2016 ; Alekseichuk et al, 2017 ; Kleinert et al, 2017 ; Pahor and Jaušovec, 2018 ; Tseng et al, 2018 ; Zhang et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%